Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
#1
Old 10-17-2003, 10:16 AM
BANNED
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 5,665
Early nude pics of Demi Moore? From when, and what magazine?

Fark.com linked to some nude pics of Demi Moore. These are not the ones from Vanity Fair in 1991, when she was pregnant. She appears much younger, and the photos are the kind you would see in Hustler, but not Playboy. They're pornographic enough that I am suspecting that they are fakes, but most of them look pretty authentic (in one her breasts look much larger than the others, and it looks like it would be from before she had them enlarged).

Are these beaver shots of Demi Moore legit? If so, when were they taken, and what magazine were they originally published in?
#2
Old 10-17-2003, 10:18 AM
BANNED
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 5,665
BTW, I know she's had nudity in quite a few films, but some of these pics are very explicit.
#3
Old 10-17-2003, 11:14 AM
kka kka is offline
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 368
Re: Early nude pics of Demi Moore? From when, and what magazine?

Quote:
Originally posted by Badtz Maru

Are these beaver shots of Demi Moore legit? If so, when were they taken, and what magazine were they originally published in?
It seems like they would have surfaced before now if they were legit.
#4
Old 10-17-2003, 11:36 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: IN USA
Posts: 13,223
My computer is down (has been for 3 weeks) & I'm on the public library Net so I can't check the pics- if young Demi is shown with medium breasts & full bush, the pics are legit & came from early 1980s (maybe even late 70s) OUI magazine, I believe.
#5
Old 10-17-2003, 11:37 AM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Front and Center
Posts: 5,928
Blame it on Rio had a couple of shots of Demi pre-enhanced. Just sayin'.
#6
Old 10-17-2003, 11:42 AM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 258
Yeah, what Ted said, Oui magazine.
#7
Old 10-17-2003, 12:41 PM
Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: chicago illinois, usa
Posts: 4,692
I can accept Oui, but did they spray paint her? My goodness, she doesn't have a bush, she has a hedge down there.
#8
Old 10-17-2003, 03:52 PM
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Quote:
Originally posted by photopat
I can accept Oui, but did they spray paint her? My goodness, she doesn't have a bush, she has a hedge down there.
Beleive it or not, there was a time when women actually had public hair down there, rather then going the Jon-Benet Ramsey route.
#9
Old 10-17-2003, 05:13 PM
Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: chicago illinois, usa
Posts: 4,692
Evil, I know pubes. I've seen pubes. That looks like a bad toupee.
#10
Old 10-17-2003, 05:14 PM
Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: chicago illinois, usa
Posts: 4,692
Or a merkin.
#11
Old 10-17-2003, 07:49 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,738
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Evil Breakfast
Beleive it or not, there was a time when women actually had public hair down there, rather then going the Jon-Benet Ramsey route.
But there has to be some middle ground between the pre-teen patch and the wild kingdom Demi was sporting in those pictures.
__________________
signature under construction
#12
Old 10-17-2003, 08:14 PM
Guest
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Up there, waiting
Posts: 17,203
Check her out in ...about last night. She's got Buckwheat in a headlock there, too.
#13
Old 10-17-2003, 08:41 PM
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Quote:
Originally posted by Justin_Bailey
But there has to be some middle ground between the pre-teen patch and the wild kingdom Demi was sporting in those pictures.
So she chose not to shave her bush.

So F---ING what?

I can assure you that there were millions of guys who wouldn't have hesitated if given the opportunity to dive in down there back in the day, regardless of whether Miss Moore shaved or not.

Christ, it seems that it's quite alright for a guy to have a set of blcok and tackle so hairy that you have to part it with a comb, but if a woman has some hair down there it's somehow a crime against humanity.

Get real.
#14
Old 10-18-2003, 12:08 AM
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 28,043
THAT is supposed to be unusually hairy? Grotesque, even? Boys, and I hope you are boys and not adult men, perhaps you should stop finding your dates at the junior high.

Day-amn! That woman has always been fine! Why on Earth did she get implants? Those are perfect!
#15
Old 10-18-2003, 04:54 AM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,738
When did I ever say it was a crime against humanity? A little maintenance goes a long way is all I'm saying.

And let's be real here, those pictures were taken in 1981 when Demi was 19 years old, right about the age that most of you are cracking jokes about as being right out of Junior High.
#16
Old 10-18-2003, 08:15 AM
Domo Arigato Mister Moderato
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: On the run with Kilroy
Posts: 20,341
Where's the link on Fark?
#17
Old 10-18-2003, 08:23 AM
BANNED
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Outer Control
Posts: 10,394
Ain't none. If you look on "fark.com' you scroll down to find a link that takes three and half years to open. But if you click on the "comments" to Demi Moore site, someone has provided a link that opens up much quicker. I'm not sure if it's okay to post the link here myself, but you can find it fairly easily.

It's amazing to me the amount of controversy generated by a photograph that, in its era, was just your standard Playboy-centerfold shot. Why not discuss some 1950s centerfold in terms of how ugly that pouffed-out hair (on the head) looks?
#18
Old 10-18-2003, 11:26 AM
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Pacific Grove, Calif
Posts: 17,493
google.com has an image search function that works pretty well.
#19
Old 10-18-2003, 02:00 PM
BANNED
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 5,665
I noticed her somewhat hirsute nature, but didn't comment on it because I realized styles have changed. I've seen enough old porn to know that was the norm then.

I disagree that these are quite 'your standard Playboy-centerfold shot.' Playboy, until rather recently, has obscured a woman's genitalia in their shots, either a raised leg, satin sheet, whatever. That's part of what made it a more 'high-class' porno mag, and separated it from raunchier mags like 'Hustler', which WOULD include pics of a woman straddling a chair backwards, where you could probably see her cervix if you had better lighting.
#20
Old 10-18-2003, 03:18 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Taint of creation
Posts: 33,150
IMO while most of the other photos are real that super furry, spread legged "demi3.jpg" shot that everyone is reacting to, is a pure (and incredibly obvious) Photoshop cowboy exercise.
#21
Old 10-18-2003, 03:47 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lair
Posts: 20,890
Moore's bush in the demi3.jpg shot is a fake, I concur. If you want to talk about escessive bush, I'd say it was the French woman in "Romance." She did nude scenes, but what the hell, everything between her bellybutton and her ass crack was covered in thick black hair. She woujld have been nuder shaved and wearing a bikini.
#22
Old 10-18-2003, 03:59 PM
Charter Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Living the Dream
Posts: 8,583
Ah, they're 1920's style "Death Rays".
#23
Old 10-18-2003, 04:19 PM
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Quote:
Originally posted by astro
IMO while most of the other photos are real that super furry, spread legged "demi3.jpg" shot that everyone is reacting to, is a pure (and incredibly obvious) Photoshop cowboy exercise.
No, it isn't a Photoshop exercise.

It's Demi Moore's actual unshaven bush.

I can recall seeing the very magazine that the photos appeared in and marveling that "Hey!! You can actually see her naughty bits even through her bush." Back when those photos were taken OUI was a notch below Playboy, in that they would show a woman with her legs sporead wide, as in the Moore photo, but wouldn't go in for the gyno-type stuff that Hustler dealt in.

And astro, what praytell, is your evidence that the photo is question is a Photoshop job, and an obvious one at that?
#24
Old 10-18-2003, 05:30 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 20,187
Revtim's law: Whenever a photo's authenticity is questioned, phrases such as "that's the worst/most obvious Photoshopping I've ever seen" will be used, even when the photo in question is 100 percent authentic.
#25
Old 10-18-2003, 07:30 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Taint of creation
Posts: 33,150
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Evil Breakfast
No, it isn't a Photoshop exercise.

It's Demi Moore's actual unshaven bush.

I can recall seeing the very magazine that the photos appeared in and marveling that "Hey!! You can actually see her naughty bits even through her bush." Back when those photos were taken OUI was a notch below Playboy, in that they would show a woman with her legs sporead wide, as in the Moore photo, but wouldn't go in for the gyno-type stuff that Hustler dealt in.

And astro, what praytell, is your evidence that the photo is question is a Photoshop job, and an obvious one at that?

Practical issues:

1: Generally when a celeb or or even a B level starlet does a nudie mag photo shoot, it's usually artsy or coy with some limited bush and typically a lot of breast shots. An "in your face" spread legged beaver shot like the one referenced is practically unheard of in these circumstances.

Art issues:

1: Her mons is insanely hairy. So hairy it looks fake. It looks like someone stole Ron Popeil's can of spray on hair and went to town. Most aspiring actresses would not have bush like this, even 25 years ago.

If it's actually her, God bless her hirsute little soul!
#26
Old 10-18-2003, 07:36 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,738
Quote:
Originally posted by astro
Practical issues:

1: Generally when a celeb or or even a B level starlet does a nudie mag photo shoot, it's usually artsy or coy with some limited bush and typically a lot of breast shots. An "in your face" spread legged beaver shot like the one referenced is practically unheard of in these circumstances.
But in 1981 she was neither of those things.

Looks to me like she had that misguided thought of "doing porn will lead to mainstream success."

But for her, it did, sort of.
#27
Old 10-18-2003, 08:10 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 20,187
Quote:
Originally posted by astro
If it's actually her, God bless her hirsute little soul!
I don't think that's her soul....
#28
Old 10-18-2003, 08:46 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 20,187
Quote:
Originally posted by astro
1: Her mons is insanely hairy. So hairy it looks fake. It looks like someone stole Ron Popeil's can of spray on hair and went to town. Most aspiring actresses would not have bush like this, even 25 years ago.
This argument makes no sense. Since most fakes are made by pasting the famous person's face on another body, then even if it's fake it's still a genuine hairy crotch. Now why would it be less likely for Demi to have a hairy crotch than the body used? Because she's an "aspiring actress"? Unless she was aspiring to do porn, why would she shave down there?
#29
Old 10-18-2003, 09:14 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lair
Posts: 20,890
I checked the photo out in photoshop. I initially thought it was faked because the pubic hair looked wrong -- the strands of hair in her bush were way too thick -- they looked more like carpet fibers than human hair. this could be an artifact of the scan or something, but it does look all wrong.

Also, if you'll look carefully at her face, the part that's resting against the pillow is a lot thicker than the part that's not. And the edge of her face looks abnormally straight. I think the faker used the outline of the original model's face. The color matching, however is excellent, but I've seen other excellent jobs of color matching.

On the side of authenticity, I note that even though Moore's legs are spread wide, you can't see a bit of pubes in there because her hair is too thick. I wonder if she wasn't the beneficiary of an airbrush artist when the pic was published in Oui, which might also explain her pubic hair's strange appearance.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 AM.

Copyright © 2017
Best Topics: guitar neck repair ventilator vs trach gloryhole archive dolcett definition long fancy names airtight casket leather cat tommy gun case ginger addiction mercurochrome walgreens kleenex man sized eating cartilage computer clock slow edd hall mics military kava capsules high calvary pronunciation wwe medusa fucking in window ewr meaning hate means darkover reading order operator number 9 1000 megaton bomb proto goth artificial watermelon flavor stalingrad statue prnd car girl message boards mythbusters jessie 1870 penny snow white horse cheers opening photos pppp power book bruise gin termite farts certificate of error homeowner exemption how to check if you have a sound card stabbing yourself in the heart can velcro get wet can you get sick from drinking sour milk shower liner vs curtain how long does homemade irish cream last amazon ship to wrong address why can't i swim who is miss piggy based on does steam delete local content delete saves how much does a frog weigh how to make money with 2000 dollars deodorant build up on shirts do cats personality change after spaying threw a toaster in the bathtub glue for car fabric how do you spell hawaiian what time of day does fedex deliver to my house? wall of sound recording standard ice cream scoop size how to ask for a kiss cocaine absorbed through skin duracell agm automotive battery joe bag of donuts i don't care about anyone anymore eco cooler does it work how long does a straight razor last country code for south africa when did the greek gods stop being worshipped zinc carbon 9v battery