indicated, it's not true that they crowdsourced a new constitution. In fact, some dodgy "news sources" have reported on the whole shebang and been corrected because they kept getting everything wrong. See here
, and the criticism
If it's true that the US media hasn't reported on it very much, that's probably because the whole thing is in fact a little more mundane than some people like to explain it. I'm sure some of the actual facts have been mentioned, but they probably just weren't that exciting. They had protests and the government stepped down. Then they had some citizen input on drafting a new constitution.
If it were some great coverup it can't be a very successful coverup. It's on wikipedia and has been reported in the Guardian and The Times.