Thread Tools
Old 09-10-2006, 03:57 PM
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: California
Posts: 3,552
How could modern tech improve on the sword?

Say you want to make a sword of the cutting variety (a samurai sword as opposed to a fencing "stabbing" sword). How could modern technology improve on it? As much as delicately folded steel is nice, we must have come up with better cutting materials in the day and age.

I imagine sort of nanotech sword that is composed of molecule thick layers set at a wedge like this:


And that every time you cut an object the outer most level would slough off as layers of graphite do leaving the blade perpetually and perfectly sharp.

I, of course, long for a lightsabre but I am more curious in products that can be produced today.
Old 09-10-2006, 04:27 PM
Charter Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota US
Posts: 15,636
I can't vouch for what indefinable qualities folded-steel swords by master swordsmiths might have. But modern steel is extremely consistant, homogenous, and dependable in it's properties. Far less likely to crack or shatter. A modern machine tool shop can turn out better swords than 99.9% of all the swordsmiths who ever lived. So the quality of your average foot-soldier's plain duty sword would be far greater. Perhaps less difference in quality at the absolute top end of the spectrum, where swords were custom crafted for one particular person with special attention to minute differences in balance, length, weight and stiffness.

Special alloys for the bit that forms the edge would be an improvement over hand-produced carbon steel: harder but less brittle, allowing the sword to retain it's sharpness much better. I don't think monomolecular bits are in the offing anytime soon though.

You could alternately produce a sword that's very light for it's size (aluminum or titanium) or extremely dense (platinum/iridium alloy), depending on which would be preferable for the intended purpose.
Old 09-10-2006, 04:34 PM
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 480 B.C.
Posts: 898
Originally Posted by Muad'Dib
And that every time you cut an object the outer most level would slough off as layers of graphite do leaving the blade perpetually and perfectly sharp.
That's what depleted uranium does. That's why they use it for tank ammo: it's self-sharpening as it ploughs through armor.
Old 09-10-2006, 04:51 PM
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Taint of creation
Posts: 33,150
Similar thread

Is there any material superior to steel for making a sword blade?
Old 09-10-2006, 05:12 PM
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern North
Posts: 1,383
Originally Posted by Muad'Dib
How could modern tech improve on the sword?
By reforging the metal into a gun.

If for some impractical reason you really want to keep it in a sword shape, you don't have to look much farther than any modern combat swords (as opposed to display swords). Modern alloys are lighter and springier than any metals used in history.
Old 09-10-2006, 05:37 PM
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Searching for Tanelorn
Posts: 6,108
Sounds like a good question to ask a modern swordsmith. Let's ask one.

Old 09-10-2006, 07:46 PM
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,584
Originally Posted by Can Handle the Truth
That's what depleted uranium does. That's why they use it for tank ammo: it's self-sharpening as it ploughs through armor.
This was quite surprising to me, I had always thought the benefit of depleted uranium for ammunition was just it's very high density, creating greater force for the acceleration of a projectile.
Wikipedia suggests that the process is somehow as you suggest, the bullet fractures upon impact, creating a newly-sharped bullets that penetrates more deeply.

Jane, on the other hand, has a slightly different take on how depleted uranium bullets have greater penetrative power: they partially melt upon impact:

I guess I don't see how the second method would help a modern ultra-sword, and I'm afraid the first method would cause, out of necessity, a much lower lifespan for a sword than you'd want, based on the quantity of bullet lost in the fracture.

What would the feasibility of a "monofiliament sword" of roleplaying game fame?
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.

Copyright © 2017
Best Topics: personal mapping smoking message board i hate fedex double filtered coffee eleison meaning lice south park chipndale strippers coffee boston style opposite of entropy toughest engineering majors topless bars houston pig genitals smell burning toast russian comrades irish orthography pvt blithe lump presidents palestine etymology coke pinky navy ctn 19 millimeter eargasm qtip timbers at troy padawan braid nut breaker midas estimate straight pubes suicide by tylenol soaking barley retching dogs what can i take for heartburn while on warfarin joe bag of donuts ask a structural engineer mark twain kiss slowly dont eat where you shit how much does employer pay for unemployment foreign credit card zip code does refrigeration kill bacteria woman wearing eye patch steroid eye drops side effects weight gain i don't want to hold your baby being called a liar when your not buying a willow tree oil pressure light flickering at idle lump presidents of the united states countertenor singers in pop music can you pawn a gun without papers why does carbonation burn do short films make money how to sharpen a curved knife kraft mac and cheese no butter what is the pocket in women's underwear for jade empire lord lao signature guarantee bank of america 1000 ways to die real or fake what do you call a nurse practitioner kevin cosgrove 9/11 ny dmv plate return can i mix oils in my car animals that see infrared removing braces at home best penetrating oil for rust how long does it take for bleach to break down where does the word gattaca originate from spongebob tiptoe through the tulips episode aluminum is a metalloid blood pressure cuff hurts