Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
#1
Old 07-06-2012, 01:43 AM
BANNED
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,596
So why do people care so much about the lives of celebrities?

I mean the nitty gritty shit, who they are banging, what they are eating, where they are shopping, whose getting married or divorced?

People are apparently eager for pics of Britney Spears shopping in Walgreens(a confidential informant told us these were the items purchased!) and eager to comment.

My theory is that as people lead less social more isolated lives they are missing some kind of outlet to gossip and comment about the neighbors/village members. As highly social animals it is probably an innate need to observe others lives and discuss and build some kind of sense of norm, whether that is bad or good is up for debate but it does seem to be a need.

I think celebrities fill the void, people can analyze their lives and actions and process and comment on it like someone hundreds of years ago would be doing with their neighbors or town residents.
#2
Old 07-06-2012, 02:03 AM
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,715
I can't understand why people would care much about the lives of celebrities, especially as far as awards shows and that kind of thing. But personally I'm somewhat interested in things like how celebrities do certain ordinary things, mostly the logistics of it. They can get their minions to do a lot of things for them but they must still need to personally go to the DMV and get a license. Or I don't care what their spotless mansions look like, but if I happen to see a picture with real lived-in surroundings in the background I'll look at it. It's not that I really care about them specifically, just how people live in the spotlight.
#3
Old 07-06-2012, 02:19 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,081
I recently asked this same question at a small dinner part and received blank stares so either they agreed with me or felt the answer was so obvious it required no response.

To me, celebrities have one main function: entertain me and I, in turn, will pay the cost of admission. Beyond that, I really have no interest in their personal lives any more than they have an interest in mine.
#4
Old 07-06-2012, 04:33 AM
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Anyone But Obama Country
Posts: 2,350
I've never understood this either.
#5
Old 07-06-2012, 05:40 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 24,019
I have a baseless suspicion that we don't care at all, and the Media just perpetuates the myth that we do. We just consume the trash passively, but they interpret our behaviour as insatiable curiosity.
#6
Old 07-06-2012, 06:17 AM
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuanoLad View Post
I have a baseless suspicion that we don't care at all, and the Media just perpetuates the myth that we do. We just consume the trash passively, but they interpret our behaviour as insatiable curiosity.
I do think there is a case of supply creating demand here. But there are plenty of celebrity gossip magazines which people buy, and that is more than just passive consumption.
#7
Old 07-06-2012, 08:01 AM
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,665
I had to read the OP twice before I realised the title contained the word "lives" - I had read it as "livers", and I thought this thread was going to about celebrities drinking habits. The mention of Britney did not exactly disabuse me of this notion .

On topic, personally I have little to no interest but I have been known to "passively consume" (as someone so nicely put it upthread) celeb news - I would never pay for it, but I might read it if there was really nothing better available. I think the theory is that people admire most celebrities for whatever talent made them a celebrity in the first place, and then every report of celebrities doing "normal" things just makes us a feel a bit closer those we worship. Seems reasonable to me.
#8
Old 07-06-2012, 08:39 AM
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,267
I have a theory that watching celebrities fail makes normal folks feel better about themselves.
#9
Old 07-06-2012, 08:54 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Randleman, NC
Posts: 1,375
It's an Illuminati conspiracy. Having their media show us the massive problems that celebrities endure discourages the lower classes from rebelling for equal status. The proles are conditioned to feel that money will not ease their current problems, and who wants all those photographers following them?

In truth, celebrities have it remarkably good. Most stories in the gossip magazines are fiction. The rich are eating fresh babies for dinner and flying to China for take-out.
#10
Old 07-06-2012, 09:45 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,056
it gives you a distraction from yours own miserable existence. celebrities and athletes don't get paid nearly enough for what they give us.
#11
Old 07-06-2012, 09:49 AM
Corellian Nerfherder
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brookfield, IL
Posts: 11,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daddypants View Post
I have a theory that watching celebrities fail makes normal folks feel better about themselves.
That wouldn't surprise me at all.

"Man, Jennifer Aniston / Angelina Jolie / Kim Kardashian sure is gorgeous and rich, but her men still treat her like dirt."

"Wow, Lindsey Lohan / Britney Spears sure has a lot of talent, but her life is still a train wreck."
#12
Old 07-06-2012, 09:52 AM
Guest
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 5,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daddypants View Post
I have a theory that watching celebrities fail makes normal folks feel better about themselves.
This. Or more broadly, "look at that outrageous and foolish behavior by someone who apparently has everything! I don't have everything, and I have more sense than that!"

Tangent: should I start a separate thread for the number of times someone has started telling me this stuff and I've rudely said something like "meh, that doesn't interest me" and they keep fucking talking?
#13
Old 07-06-2012, 10:08 AM
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,679
I'd like to know who these "close personal friends" are who report the dirty laundry of their famous "friends". Sell gossip about your "friend" to a tabloid? Nice friend. Also when headlines blare "The Secret XXXX of <Famous Person>!" No so damn secret anymore, is it?! I actually feel bad for celebrities, it seems like they can't trust anyone.

As for paparazzi: I think they are bottom-feeding scum. If a regular person was being stalked, staked out and photographed without their consent the cops would be called. But it's okay for these slimeballs to use their high-powered lenses to take photos of little kids just because the kid's parent is famous? WTF? If someone, anyone, was hiding in the bushes taking photos of my child I'd go berserk.

I don't give a rat's ass about what celebrities do in their everyday lives. They are regular people who happen to have a high-profile career. What they do with their career, how they look and act "on the red carpet", and how they treat those around them is what interests me, not when they're playing with their kids in Central Park or grocery shopping.
#14
Old 07-06-2012, 10:16 AM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,040
Ten years ago when I was working in an office setting where I was one of four men and about 30 plus women i learned quite a bit.
Once on a cigarette break i asked a lady why she bought the celeb mags. She said simply that reading about them fascinated her.. and took her mind off her own life.. one in which i later learned included rotten kids.. and a husband who had abandoned her emotionally.
It seems pretty clear to me that demand is ahead of supply in this matter.. and that we've always had this need to gawk. It's also clear to me that the goto response is always.."I think its stupid.. I would never bother.... who cares"..
I'll acknowledge that I read several small pieces on Tom Cruise Katie Holmes break-up. The combination of her being gorgeous.. my ex making me sit thru Dawson Creek.. Cruise being in soo many damn movies and his weird ass "religion".. interesting..
#15
Old 07-06-2012, 10:38 AM
The Central Scrutinizer
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pork Roll/Taylor Ham
Posts: 24,054
A lot of people would like to know the salacious details of their friends and neighbor's lives. Its hard to find that in a magazine.
#16
Old 07-06-2012, 11:14 AM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Chicago suburbia
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by grude View Post
My theory is that as people lead less social more isolated lives they are missing some kind of outlet to gossip and comment about the neighbors/village members. As highly social animals it is probably an innate need to observe others lives and discuss and build some kind of sense of norm, whether that is bad or good is up for debate but it does seem to be a need.
Sorta-kinda in my opinion. People find other people fascinating. People like to talk about other people. But no one in my office (for example) knows and my of friends or neighbors. Celebrities are a shared experience in that we likely both know why Brittney Spears is and can discuss her make-up choices at the drug store and what flavor of Arizona tea she likes best.

Or, more salaciously, who she's currently fucking and what drug arrests she's being tried for.
#17
Old 07-06-2012, 01:13 PM
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,106
Some people are more inclined to gossip than others. They're just interested more in reading or talking about the lives of others than living their own. No value judgment, though... it's just a form of escapism and entertainment (like watching tv or playing video games). And it's better for them than drinking! So, what's the problem? I mean, if someone asks me why I like to play computer games, I'd say, "Because it's fun." Same principle applies to celebrity-watching.
#18
Old 07-06-2012, 01:19 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 920
Vicarious enjoyment. As most grind out lives with minimal money and prestige, they look to those with more for fulfillment.
#19
Old 07-07-2012, 02:59 AM
Guest
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greater Boston Area
Posts: 778
I kinda get it, and I kinda don't. I spend a lot of my free time researching random things, and often it's the life of a celebrity. I'll go dig up all their movies/albums, pester the library for books -- bonus points if the obscure book is something they've written, and JACKPOT! if they've actually got a readable autobiography -- and go scouting around online for interviews, particularly if they're recent enough to have been on video. But I really only do it if the celebrity in question is someone I'd also be interested in if I knew them personally. I run a profile on them because they're intriguing; I just know they exist because they've been in a bunch of movies. In that case, I pay attention to minutia the same as I would someone I get to hang around in person. Details can tell you more than you'd think.

On the other hand, I don't get why Random Celebrity X getting coffee is so fascinating to most people that nationally-distributed magazines will pay money for a picture of it. Hoovering up gossip about anyone famous that happens to cross your radar is essentially paying attention to something strictly because other people are paying attention to it, which isn't usually enough of a reason for me to care. Paparazzi photos also give me the willies for reasons I can't quite explain, and I refuse to use them when I do my researching bit -- I stick strictly to things the celebrity intended to make public. (Or, if I'm poking into true crime stuff, what the investigation made public.) So I can't give you the general reason for it, on account of I apparently squick easily when confronted with invasions of privacy, and I avoid them.

I suspect that a lot of it is either schadenfreude or an effort to identify with people we see as living on a different plane of existence. Look, we both get Starbucks in the morning! or Hey, at least my life isn't a giant public drug disaster! I tend to pick different stuff to identify with, though, so the whole bonding-through-coffee thing doesn't work well for me.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: [email protected]

Send comments about this website to:

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright 2018 STM Reader, LLC.

Copyright © 2017
Best Topics: average male inseam van mural vamanos meaning gesundheit yiddish prorated electric bill colete dust cancun topless autria godfrey hot civ 5 emperor southpark the aristocrats neutering an older dog side effects suicide by stabbing yourself in the heart how to transfer answering machine messages to computer how to speed up peristalsis here comes a flock of wa was how is a switch rated? royal canin recovery diet klaatu veritas nikto meaning notch in dog tag what do godparents buy for first communion how hot is hot as balls what does truffle taste like dope female dog names