Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2017, 01:52 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 23,567
Spider-Man Homecoming - Seen It (spoilers allowed)

I guess I should leave some spoiler space so the first paragraph will not reveal anything plot specific.

There have been rather too many Spider-Man movies in the last 15 years. I really enjoyed the Tobey Maguire, Sam Raimi films, even emo-Peter in the third one, though that had plenty of other problems, and the fourth was going to have the Vulture in it, I believe played by John Malkovitch.

Then there were the rebooted movies that covered the exact same ground in almost the exact same way and contributed nothing new, but their third was also planning to have The Vulture as the bad guy, I seem to recall.

Now the rights have reverted, at least partially, back to Marvel to control and they've taken him back to High School age, keeping him there for as long as they can stretch it, and The Vulture is finally here on screen, played by Batman. I mean Birdman. I mean Michael Keaton.

It is a good movie. It's fun, exciting, funny, thrilling, spectacular, amazing, and worth seeing. But it does suffer from Spider-Man Exhaustion, and feels like we're covering the same ground one more time. It's a little better at it, it avoids an origin story retelling, and doesn't have any Osbornes or the usual array of girlfriend characters, and the focus is very much on Peter being a clumsy kid in High School, and his dream to be a part of the Avengers, neither of which has been in the other movies, but everything else is very familiar and, aside from being handled really well and having great humour throughout, may be a bit much to take if you're not a dedicated Marvel/Superhero/Spider-Man fan. The casual viewer might justifiably be over it.

Having said that, I recommend it. It is entertaining to the very end* and has a lot of secondary characters who are fun to watch too. And a couple of surprise character cameos from other Marvel films mixed in. I look forward to seeing where the next movie takes things, scheduled for July 2019 already.

*To the very very very end
Old 07-06-2017, 06:37 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: expat in The Hague, NL
Posts: 678
My husband and I saw it last night. It was a lot of fun - especially the "Peter as a clumsy kid" moments. We (and the theatre) laughed a lot.

I especially loved the first 5 minutes, with the footage. Great to see some things from unexpected angles. I also liked Peter's friend Ned. The scenes after Peter disables the training wheel protocol on the suit were also funny. I liked the lecture scene between Stark and Peter (shown in the trailers a bit), especially knowing where Tony has come from.

And when the pieces finally fall into place for The Vulture - great acting by Michael Keaton.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuanoLad View Post

*To the very very very end
I agree. Very entertaining - to the very end!
Old 07-06-2017, 06:41 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 23,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadez View Post
And when the pieces finally fall into place for The Vulture - great acting by Michael Keaton.
Yes! That was great writing and great acting. No need for stretching out feigned ignorance, it was handled really well.
Old 07-06-2017, 10:44 AM
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,971
Looking forward to this. I skipped the middle re-boot sequence, so I may not be quite as burnt out as some.
Old 07-06-2017, 12:45 PM
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Barsoom
Posts: 3,759
AFAIK, in every S-M movie to date, Peter Parker (improbably) is already personally acquainted with the bad guy: Sandman killed Uncle Ben, Doc Ock was his teacher, Green Goblin was his friend's dad. Does he know the Vulture besides fighting him as S-M?
Old 07-07-2017, 08:05 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,013
I agree with all the positive reactions above. I've loved every Marvel movie since Iron Man (though I didn't see the Hulk movies) and this was no exception. Even though it will add fuel to the "I'm so tired of superheros/reboots" crybaby whining, I'm thrilled we have 3 extremely good superhero movies in the theaters right now. I wish a theater here would show a triple feature. I may do it myself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of a Rich View Post
AFAIK, in every S-M movie to date, Peter Parker (improbably) is already personally acquainted with the bad guy: Sandman killed Uncle Ben, Doc Ock was his teacher, Green Goblin was his friend's dad. Does he know the Vulture besides fighting him as S-M?
Peter doesn't know Vulture prior to their interactions, but if improbable connections bother you, you should brace yourself, expect a face palm moment then just relax and go with it.
Old 07-07-2017, 08:38 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 14,041
Saw it last night with a bunch of pre-teens and everyone enjoyed it. I liked the first two McGuire films, was meh on the third and the first Garfield one, and skipped the last one. So I had been pretty much done with the character until Sony brought in Marvel.

- I liked the use of the old TV-show music over the opening titles.
- I liked teen-age Parker. The reviewer on NPR was underwhelmed and said that Peter and his friends didn't act like real teenagers and he compared them to Mickey Rooney-Judy Garland type teens from the '30s, but I was reminded of the teen movies of the 80's where you have the awkward teen, the awkward-er best friend, the crush, the weird outsider who turns out to be cool. Instead of Rooney/Garfield I thought of Anthony Michael Hall and Molly Ringwald (if AMH got bitten by a radioactive spider).
- Keaton was, as usual, terrific. Especially in his initial scene and the one in the car with Peter, but really in every scene he was in he took the focus.

I did think the movie was too long (2:15 or so?) and I wasn't a huge fan of sidekick Ned. I also wish they had done more with Marissa Tomei. More Marissa Tomei is always good. I'm not going to deny I've got a thing for Aunt May.

I really like Jon Favreau, and he's done great work as a director, but I felt his acting was off in this one. I liked him in Chef but here he just seemed uncomfortable and not because he was handing out in a high school bathroom.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of a Rich View Post
AFAIK, in every S-M movie to date, Peter Parker (improbably) is already personally acquainted with the bad guy: Sandman killed Uncle Ben, Doc Ock was his teacher, Green Goblin was his friend's dad. Does he know the Vulture besides fighting him as S-M?
I don't want to spoil it but Peter does learn they have an unlikely connection, but that's after they've already become adversaries.
Old 07-07-2017, 01:11 PM
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,881
I saw it last night and really liked it. Tom Holland was great as Spider-Man and Peter Parker. The action was pretty good, although I couldn't tell what was happening a few times in the fights with Vulture. It was really funny, the whole theater was laughing out loud a lot.

I really liked that there was a good villain with The Vulture. So many comic book movies have poorly defined villains or the villain has poorly defined goals and motivations, but Vulture made sense in the story, and Michael Keaton was great as him. Also his wings were pretty cool.

Tony Stark was inconsistent but I guess that's kinda his thing. It should be predictable that if you give a high school student a million dollar suit with weapons he's going to use it. And then he yelled at Peter after the ferry incident, but then Peter did the exact same thing again and tried to capture the baddie just with a lot more inherent danger since he was in his homemade costume, and then Tony acted like he'd learned his lesson. He was lucky that the plane didn't crash into a populated area.
Old 07-07-2017, 01:17 PM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,408
Keaton was incredible in this movie. So creepy and threatening and intimidating and yet you could see the desperation to provide for his family there too. A very human villain who didn't WANT to be a supervillain and tried his best NOT to attract attention. An incredibly realistic take on a guy like that. Loved Tom Holland, and also really liked Jacob Batalon's Ned Leeds. I cracked up when the dean walks in on him in the library during the dance when he's coordinating Peter's mission and asks him what he's doing and he stutters "looking at porn?"
Best Spider-Man movie by far.
Old 07-07-2017, 01:46 PM
Guest
Join Date: May 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,277
I liked it quite a bit. I liked the way the story grew out of the events of the Avengers. Tooms may be one of the best Marvel Movie villains.

I liked his entire storyline. When Agents of SHIELD was first announced, this was the kind of villain I expected. In fact he would have made a great season one Big Bad if they had gone in that direction.

The Twist shocked me and then shocked me again. At first I thought it was a hostage situation and then realized what was really happening. Really well set up.

So what villain was the guy from Better Call Saul playing? The mid credits scene makes it clear he isn't just some thug.

And the final post credits scene was masterful and serves us all right

Last edited by Quimby; 07-07-2017 at 01:47 PM.
Old 07-07-2017, 03:13 PM
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by RikWriter View Post
Keaton was incredible in this movie. So creepy and threatening and intimidating and yet you could see the desperation to provide for his family there too. A very human villain who didn't WANT to be a supervillain and tried his best NOT to attract attention. An incredibly realistic take on a guy like that. Loved Tom Holland, and also really liked Jacob Batalon's Ned Leeds. I cracked up when the dean walks in on him in the library during the dance when he's coordinating Peter's mission and asks him what he's doing and he stutters "looking at porn?"
Best Spider-Man movie by far.
I really liked Ned, and I liked that allowed Peter to have someone to play off of and get excited about being Spider-Man.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quimby View Post

So what villain was the guy from Better Call Saul playing? The mid credits scene makes it clear he isn't just some thug.

And the final post credits scene was masterful and serves us all right
I heard he's Scorpion, I don't know who that is but he did have a scorpion tattoo and exoskeleton arm thing on in that mid credits scene.

I loved the post credit scene, and all the Cap cameos.
Old 07-07-2017, 05:11 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,848
I just got back from seeing it. I loved it! Tom Holland was great and Keaton played a terrific Vulture. The action sequences were well done and fun, as Spiderman action should be. And lots of great comedy. The plot elements of Stark mentoring Parker were also well done.

All in all, Spiderman plays well as a dorky teenager because it is very fitting with his overall demeanor. I was surprised that there wasn't a scene of Stark chewing out Parker for all the damage he caused while chasing the van. I was really expecting it.

The Captain America videos were great. 100% Cap. And the last one was just too funny.

Oh and Aunt May's last line was a literal LOL.

I'd go see it again for sure. I'll probably even pick it up on bluray when it comes out.
Old 07-07-2017, 05:13 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Lowry View Post
I really liked that there was a good villain with The Vulture. So many comic book movies have poorly defined villains or the villain has poorly defined goals and motivations, but Vulture made sense in the story, and Michael Keaton was great as him. Also his wings were pretty cool.
I liked Vulture as the villain as well. Keep it simple. He's just a thief. A successful thief, with dangerous weapons, but just a thief. Not every movie has to be about saving the world.
Old 07-07-2017, 11:25 PM
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,389
Just saw it -- thought it was great. If not a top-tier MCU movie than it's at the top of the 2nd tier. Keaton was terrific as Vulture, and I'm glad he lived. One of the best Marvel villains, IMO.
Old 07-08-2017, 12:11 AM
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 201
Massive spoilers follow with my thoughts.

I really enjoyed it. As a huge Spider-man fan, I'm hardly exhausted. In fact, if they rebooted Spider-man every year I'd happily watch it. So maybe the fact that I really liked it doesn't mean that much.

Firstly, it's a cliche to say that Tobey Maguire was the better Peter Parker and Andrew Garfield was the better Spider-man, but there is something to it. Maguire potrayed the nerdy, shy, outcast Peter Parker and Garfield did a great job of the wise cracking smartass Spider-man. The problem is both played their counterparts the exact same way. Maguire's Spider-man was kind of a nerd and Garfield's Peter Parker was a wisecracking smartass. The hope for the new movie was that it would manage to capture the Maguire Parker and the Garfield Spider-man.

Now, I'm not sure if Tom Holland really portrayed Peter as an outcast all that well. We're told that everyone hates him and thinks he's weird, and by told I mean the other characters keep saying that everyone hates him and thinks he's weird. But with the exception of Flash Thompson constantly referring to him as "Penis Parker", they don't really seem to act like they hate him. Hell, he even manages to go to the dance with the girl he likes. But it still did a pretty good job of portraying nerdy Peter and smartass Spider-man. Sure, Peter Parker didn't really know how to be Spider-man, but you could still see the difference when he put on the suit.

On that note, the film did a good job showing Peter Parker learning to be Spider-man. Each film series has done this progressively better. The Sam Raimi films showed him discovering his powers, but once he knew he had them there seemed to be no learning curve. The Andrew Garfield films were a little better in this regard, but still he seemed too confident early on. Here, I liked how he was making mistakes and not 100% sure how to be Spider-man. I think this is because the film isn't bogged down trying to retell the origin story, so it can go into more detail on things like this.

Likewise, each film series has progressively gotten better at depicting the work/life balance of Spider-man/Peter Parker. It was an important plot point in Spider-man 2, but way less important in the first and third. Amazing Spider-man was a little better, but even then not so much. This one really showed Peter constantly missing out on things by being Spider-man. The dance, the contest, school, yada yada yada.

Now, the Vulture. I wasn't expecting much, as he's not one of my favourite Spider-man villains and the Marvel movies have a track record of mediocre bad guys. But I was pleasantly surprised. His motivations made sense, and I liked how small scale his whole villain plan actually was. And I liked that they threw in Shocker as a smaller villain, though I don't know why they needed two.

I really liked the minor inversion at the end. Any other film would have him in the crappy Spider-man suit for the first two thirds and put him in the "classic" suit right at the end. It was cool how they switched that around. But it annoyed me that, even though it was obviously going to happen from the moment Tony took the suit away, they had to repeat the voice over just to make sure the audience would know what they were saying.

Seriously movie, give us some credit.

Also, I got some fanboy giddiness when the suit identified one of the guys on the boat as "Mac Gargon". Though the film now has robbed me of the chance to spend the next two years speculating on who the villain will be in the sequel.

Some things I didn't care for, though.

Why did his friend need to know he was Spider-man? It feels like since Robert Downey Jr announed "I'm Iron Man" in 2008 that superheroes don't have secret identities anymore. It didn't bother me too much, but it did take away quite a bit of tension. Then again, I prefer this to a hypothetical scene where said friend is complaining about Peter constantly disappearing.

Also, while I did laugh at the end... Aunt May should not know Peter is Spider-man. But I'm going to be annoyed no matter what way they go with this. If in the next movie she's well aware of it then I'm going to be annoyed. If Peter comes up with an excuse ("it's just a copy Tony Stark gave me, I'm not really Spider-man") then the film has lied to the audience and I'm going to be annoyed.

Also, Mary Jane's name is Mary Jane. Not Michelle. And on that note she's not April from Parks and Recreation or Daria.

Finally, two complaints that are less about this film specifically and more about the MCU in general. I laughed at the post credit scene, but seriously can we just stop with them? The film goes for over two hours, there's a ton of ads at the start, and now you want us to sit and wait for the credits to finish?

Also, I never noticed it until I saw this video, but the music is really boring in MCU movies, with the exception of Guardians of the Galaxy. The rendition of the 60s theme was cool, but that was it. The music was the same basic stuff they have in all the movies. And I like the Ramones, but filmmakers need to learn that they have more than one song.

In the end, while I really enjoyed this movie, I think my biggest problem with it is that it's just another MCU movie. It looks like them, it sounds like them, it feels like them. Say what you will about the Sam Raimi trilogy, but they had their own style. (The Amazing Spider-man not so much, to be honest). Even without Iron Man and all the other characters, I think you could tell it's an MCU movie. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing, but I worry that will hold the series back a bit if it moves forward.

But let's not end on a down note. I really liked it. Spider-man 2 is still my favourite, but this one's up there.
Old 07-08-2017, 10:26 AM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14,099
It's was just....ok.
Old 07-08-2017, 10:54 AM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 56,140
I thought it was strange that Toomes had been in the alien-weapons business for years, and yet the only crime we see or hear about is the one attempted ATM robbery and maybe the Donald Glover character might've used a fancy gun to whack a guy, but not too fancy. Further, every crime we see Toomes' gang attempt is to get more materials for weapons, not knocking over armored cars or banks or such.

Basically, I'm unclear on how Toomes' revenue stream works.

I'm glad they didn't run the origin story again, but shouldn't there have been at least a passing mention of how Peter let a thief get away and it didn't end well? I can see him walking into the dance, all intimidated, then regaining his resolve.
Old 07-08-2017, 10:54 AM
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 7,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowSoonIsThen View Post
Massive spoilers follow with my thoughts.

I really enjoyed it. As a huge Spider-man fan, I'm hardly exhausted. In fact, if they rebooted Spider-man every year I'd happily watch it. So maybe the fact that I really liked it doesn't mean that much.

Firstly, it's a cliche to say that Tobey Maguire was the better Peter Parker and Andrew Garfield was the better Spider-man, but there is something to it. Maguire potrayed the nerdy, shy, outcast Peter Parker and Garfield did a great job of the wise cracking smartass Spider-man. The problem is both played their counterparts the exact same way. Maguire's Spider-man was kind of a nerd and Garfield's Peter Parker was a wisecracking smartass. The hope for the new movie was that it would manage to capture the Maguire Parker and the Garfield Spider-man.

Now, I'm not sure if Tom Holland really portrayed Peter as an outcast all that well. We're told that everyone hates him and thinks he's weird, and by told I mean the other characters keep saying that everyone hates him and thinks he's weird. But with the exception of Flash Thompson constantly referring to him as "Penis Parker", they don't really seem to act like they hate him. Hell, he even manages to go to the dance with the girl he likes. But it still did a pretty good job of portraying nerdy Peter and smartass Spider-man. Sure, Peter Parker didn't really know how to be Spider-man, but you could still see the difference when he put on the suit.

On that note, the film did a good job showing Peter Parker learning to be Spider-man. Each film series has done this progressively better. The Sam Raimi films showed him discovering his powers, but once he knew he had them there seemed to be no learning curve. The Andrew Garfield films were a little better in this regard, but still he seemed too confident early on. Here, I liked how he was making mistakes and not 100% sure how to be Spider-man. I think this is because the film isn't bogged down trying to retell the origin story, so it can go into more detail on things like this.

Likewise, each film series has progressively gotten better at depicting the work/life balance of Spider-man/Peter Parker. It was an important plot point in Spider-man 2, but way less important in the first and third. Amazing Spider-man was a little better, but even then not so much. This one really showed Peter constantly missing out on things by being Spider-man. The dance, the contest, school, yada yada yada.

Now, the Vulture. I wasn't expecting much, as he's not one of my favourite Spider-man villains and the Marvel movies have a track record of mediocre bad guys. But I was pleasantly surprised. His motivations made sense, and I liked how small scale his whole villain plan actually was. And I liked that they threw in Shocker as a smaller villain, though I don't know why they needed two.

I really liked the minor inversion at the end. Any other film would have him in the crappy Spider-man suit for the first two thirds and put him in the "classic" suit right at the end. It was cool how they switched that around. But it annoyed me that, even though it was obviously going to happen from the moment Tony took the suit away, they had to repeat the voice over just to make sure the audience would know what they were saying.

Seriously movie, give us some credit.

Also, I got some fanboy giddiness when the suit identified one of the guys on the boat as "Mac Gargon". Though the film now has robbed me of the chance to spend the next two years speculating on who the villain will be in the sequel.

Some things I didn't care for, though.

Why did his friend need to know he was Spider-man? It feels like since Robert Downey Jr announed "I'm Iron Man" in 2008 that superheroes don't have secret identities anymore. It didn't bother me too much, but it did take away quite a bit of tension. Then again, I prefer this to a hypothetical scene where said friend is complaining about Peter constantly disappearing.

Also, while I did laugh at the end... Aunt May should not know Peter is Spider-man. But I'm going to be annoyed no matter what way they go with this. If in the next movie she's well aware of it then I'm going to be annoyed. If Peter comes up with an excuse ("it's just a copy Tony Stark gave me, I'm not really Spider-man") then the film has lied to the audience and I'm going to be annoyed.

Also, Mary Jane's name is Mary Jane. Not Michelle. And on that note she's not April from Parks and Recreation or Daria.

Finally, two complaints that are less about this film specifically and more about the MCU in general. I laughed at the post credit scene, but seriously can we just stop with them? The film goes for over two hours, there's a ton of ads at the start, and now you want us to sit and wait for the credits to finish?

Also, I never noticed it until I saw this video, but the music is really boring in MCU movies, with the exception of Guardians of the Galaxy. The rendition of the 60s theme was cool, but that was it. The music was the same basic stuff they have in all the movies. And I like the Ramones, but filmmakers need to learn that they have more than one song.

In the end, while I really enjoyed this movie, I think my biggest problem with it is that it's just another MCU movie. It looks like them, it sounds like them, it feels like them. Say what you will about the Sam Raimi trilogy, but they had their own style. (The Amazing Spider-man not so much, to be honest). Even without Iron Man and all the other characters, I think you could tell it's an MCU movie. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing, but I worry that will hold the series back a bit if it moves forward.

But let's not end on a down note. I really liked it. Spider-man 2 is still my favourite, but this one's up there.
Wow, what a great assessment! I have never heard the "Tobey is a better Peter, Andrew is a better Spiderman" thing before, but it's completely spot on. Pretty much everything else you said I agree with wholeheartedly.

I enjoyed this movie much more than I thought I would. I, too, love Spiderman and I think this movie got almost everything with him exactly right.

To disagree with the above poster, I actually liked the little changes they made. They were able to make Spiderman different enough for a fresher take on him, but not so different that they change/ruin the character.

If Scorpion is going to be the villain in the next movie, I wonder how they're going to do him? IIRC, he was never that spectacular other than a tail that spits acid. He's a worse/more boring Doc Ock. Unless they go really crazy and somehow put the Venom suit on him, but I doubt that because it's been confirmed that Venom won't be in the MCU.

All in all, a great movie. I enjoyed it WAY more than I thought I would and it's right up there in the upper echelon of MCU movies.
Old 07-08-2017, 11:09 AM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14,099
How is Aunt May related to Peter in this continuity? No Ben is mentioned. She is either has mom/dad's sibling or an unrelated person in a highly inappropriate relationship with a teen; a place Tony Stark also began reaching late in the movie.
Old 07-08-2017, 11:27 AM
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In the Dreaming
Posts: 21,673
Sugar Momma. Spiderman gotta eat.
Old 07-08-2017, 11:31 AM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers View Post
I thought it was strange that Toomes had been in the alien-weapons business for years, and yet the only crime we see or hear about is the one attempted ATM robbery and maybe the Donald Glover character might've used a fancy gun to whack a guy, but not too fancy. Further, every crime we see Toomes' gang attempt is to get more materials for weapons, not knocking over armored cars or banks or such.

Basically, I'm unclear on how Toomes' revenue stream works.
I thought that was made clear several times: he SOLD the weapons to other criminals.
Old 07-08-2017, 11:33 AM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir T-Cups View Post

If Scorpion is going to be the villain in the next movie, I wonder how they're going to do him? IIRC, he was never that spectacular other than a tail that spits acid.
Most of the time, his tail didn't spit acid, it was more like a battering ram. It would look incredibly silly as a straight live-action translation, so I have a feeling they'll make it more like a Predator-style over-the-shoulder gun mounted on a backpack with a powered exoskeleton to allow him to carry it.
Old 07-08-2017, 11:41 AM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 56,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by RikWriter View Post
I thought that was made clear several times: he SOLD the weapons to other criminals.
Yes, out of a van under a bridge. My point is I don't recall any news reports, even in passing, that there was an increase in crimes committed with exotic weapons. If they're being bought, why aren't they being used?
Old 07-08-2017, 11:44 AM
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK84 View Post
How is Aunt May related to Peter in this continuity? No Ben is mentioned. She is either has mom/dad's sibling or an unrelated person in a highly inappropriate relationship with a teen; a place Tony Stark also began reaching late in the movie.
Pretty sure it's the same -- Ben and May took care of Peter after his parents died, and then at some point before the movie started, Ben died.
Old 07-08-2017, 12:00 PM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers View Post
Yes, out of a van under a bridge. My point is I don't recall any news reports, even in passing, that there was an increase in crimes committed with exotic weapons. If they're being bought, why aren't they being used?
Spider-Man is only concerned with what happens right in his neighborhood. He's a 15 year old kid who's trying to go to school and be a local superhero...he might not be watching the news from New Jersey or Chicago or even Brooklyn.
Old 07-08-2017, 12:41 PM
Guest
Join Date: May 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers View Post
Yes, out of a van under a bridge. My point is I don't recall any news reports, even in passing, that there was an increase in crimes committed with exotic weapons. If they're being bought, why aren't they being used?
My memory of it was fuzzy but there was scene where they discussed how they were keeping things very quiet but someone made a mistake and over reached which brought them unwanted attention.

As I wrote above, this gang would have made a great Agents of SHIELD villain. In fact it was kind of weird how SHIELD was not even mentioned other than a mention of the Triskelion.
Old 07-08-2017, 12:48 PM
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Barsoom
Posts: 3,759
Wouldn't the Vulture's apparatus be worth more than anything he'd gain as a criminal? Or was that question answered?
Old 07-08-2017, 01:30 PM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of a Rich View Post
Wouldn't the Vulture's apparatus be worth more than anything he'd gain as a criminal? Or was that question answered?
That would be a one-time score. Having the flying suit made it possible for him to keep stealing from Damage Control and maintaining a steady stream of income.
Old 07-08-2017, 03:07 PM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 56,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quimby View Post
As I wrote above, this gang would have made a great Agents of SHIELD villain. In fact it was kind of weird how SHIELD was not even mentioned other than a mention of the Triskelion.
My girlfriend says there's a momentary cameo by Phil Coulson at the ATM after the attempted robbery, but I missed it.
Old 07-08-2017, 03:15 PM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Obamatopia
Posts: 10,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers View Post
My girlfriend says there's a momentary cameo by Phil Coulson at the ATM after the attempted robbery, but I missed it.
Seems like this hasn't been mentioned anywhere else yet, maybe she was confused.
Old 07-08-2017, 04:36 PM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Obamatopia
Posts: 10,059
BTW I'm going to pretend putting an invisible plane in the movie was a dig at DC.
Old 07-08-2017, 04:46 PM
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DC area
Posts: 29,552
I've been burnt out with the Avengers and Guardians, so I only went to this because the reviews were good. I found it really enjoyable. Loved Ned and the learning curve. Michael Keaton was excellent and believable. Marisa Tomei was a little bit wasted.

Last edited by wonky; 07-08-2017 at 04:47 PM.
Old 07-08-2017, 05:19 PM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 56,140
So if Spider-Man wants to face relatively localized street-level challenges, are we going to to see him making cameos in the Defenders?
Old 07-08-2017, 06:35 PM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Obamatopia
Posts: 10,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers View Post
So if Spider-Man wants to face relatively localized street-level challenges, are we going to to see him making cameos in the Defenders?
Zero chance, the TV shows and the movies are in a shared universe in name only. You'll get a few name drops in the TV show, but they will never be acknowledged in the movies.
Old 07-08-2017, 09:41 PM
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,971
I loved this. They did a great job with the characters. It was funny. I wanted to smack Stark. The Cap videos were a good touch (he's a probably a war criminal but I have to show you this). It was just a fun movie.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quimby View Post
My memory of it was fuzzy but there was scene where they discussed how they were keeping things very quiet but someone made a mistake and over reached which brought them unwanted attention.
It was a reference back to the scene where Peter spotted the flares from the party. When they were demoing weapons under the bridge for the buyer. They were supposed to sell underground, so they wouldn't get seen but they broke the rules and did it in the open.
Old 07-09-2017, 01:25 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quimby View Post
So what villain was the guy from Better Call Saul playing? The mid credits scene makes it clear he isn't just some thug.

And the final post credits scene was masterful and serves us all right
Max Gargan was the scorpion hence the neck tattoo of a scorpion.
Old 07-09-2017, 01:27 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalC View Post
Zero chance, the TV shows and the movies are in a shared universe in name only. You'll get a few name drops in the TV show, but they will never be acknowledged in the movies.
Netflix couldn't possibly afford Tom Holland.
Old 07-09-2017, 02:00 AM
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Barsoom
Posts: 3,759
Does this iteration of S-M have silk glands, or does he use web shooters like in the comic books?
Old 07-09-2017, 02:07 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 22,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son of a Rich View Post
Does this iteration of S-M have silk glands, or does he use web shooters like in the comic books?
Web shooters. You even see him mixing some formula, and where he keeps his stash.
Old 07-09-2017, 02:09 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowSoonIsThen View Post
Now, I'm not sure if Tom Holland really portrayed Peter as an outcast all that well. We're told that everyone hates him and thinks he's weird, and by told I mean the other characters keep saying that everyone hates him and thinks he's weird. But with the exception of Flash Thompson constantly referring to him as "Penis Parker", they don't really seem to act like they hate him. Hell, he even manages to go to the dance with the girl he likes. But it still did a pretty good job of portraying nerdy Peter and smartass Spider-man. Sure, Peter Parker didn't really know how to be Spider-man, but you could still see the difference when he put on the suit.
That was because they were updating the idea based on how we tend to view outcasts in high school.

In the 60s he was always called "bookworm" parker but of course this is a more modern version and Flash Thompson instead of being a popular jock bully is more of this preppie rich kid who treats him with contempt.

Quote:
Why did his friend need to know he was Spider-man? It feels like since Robert Downey Jr announed "I'm Iron Man" in 2008 that superheroes don't have secret identities anymore. It didn't bother me too much, but it did take away quite a bit of tension. Then again, I prefer this to a hypothetical scene where said friend is complaining about Peter constantly disappearing.
"Ned" is probably Ned Leeds who he didn't run into in the comic series until he got into the Daily Bugle. In addition to eventually marrying Betty Brant(who does show up in the movie) he actually eventually becomes a villain, the Hobgoblin. Whether they'll go that route we'll see.

Quote:
Also, Mary Jane's name is Mary Jane. Not Michelle. And on that note she's not April from Parks and Recreation or Daria.
Perhaps I'm missing a joke but she says at the end "call me MJ" so she's pretty clearly supposed to be their version of Mary Jane.

Also "Liz" was almost certainly supposed to be "Liz Allen"(though obviously they changed the name) his first crush in high school.

Her father wasn't a super criminal but it eventually turned out her brother was The Molten Man. She also eventually married Harry Osbourne.
Old 07-09-2017, 03:47 AM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14,099
Did anyone else miss the "Liz's dad is going to be the flying scrap collector"? Cause I did. Which mean that the decision to make Liz be black actually was thought out rather than just colour blind casting.

Which I wonder says what about me and other movie goers.
Old 07-09-2017, 04:10 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 6,160
One thing I'm curious about...who is actually on the Avengers as of Homecoming?

Iron Man. Vision.... maybe Black Widow? Presumably War Machine.

Everyone else had left at the end of the Civil War.
Old 07-09-2017, 04:27 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 23,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Push You Down View Post
Iron Man. Vision.... maybe Black Widow? Presumably War Machine.
There's also Scarlet Witch. And technically Thor and Hulk, though who knows what will happen at the end of their movie in November. Doctor Strange and Black Panther will be officially part of the team next year as Infinity War begins, I imagine. That will be a crowded movie.
Old 07-09-2017, 06:10 AM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuanoLad View Post
There's also Scarlet Witch. And technically Thor and Hulk, though who knows what will happen at the end of their movie in November. Doctor Strange and Black Panther will be officially part of the team next year as Infinity War begins, I imagine. That will be a crowded movie.

No, Scarlet Witch was on Cap's side.
Old 07-09-2017, 07:38 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 23,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by RikWriter View Post
No, Scarlet Witch was on Cap's side.
I thought they made up afterward, and all that mattered was who ran away. There were a bunch in the prison under the ocean, I figure they're all still Avengers.
Old 07-09-2017, 09:11 AM
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North of the River
Posts: 2,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalC View Post
BTW I'm going to pretend putting an invisible plane in the movie was a dig at DC.
Nah, Agents of SHIELD has had invisible/cloaked planes all along, I think - certainly the last couple of seasons.
Old 07-09-2017, 11:35 AM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern New England
Posts: 1,319
If Cap and the others are still "war criminals," why did Happy make the comment about Cap's new shield being in the transport ship?

I loved the final stinger. Chris Evans' tight smile when he's asks "How many more of these?" through is teeth was hilarious.
Old 07-09-2017, 11:50 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuanoLad View Post
There's also Scarlet Witch. And technically Thor and Hulk, though who knows what will happen at the end of their movie in November. Doctor Strange and Black Panther will be officially part of the team next year as Infinity War begins, I imagine. That will be a crowded movie.
I'm talking who is REALLY on the team for Tony to have a press conference announcing a new member.

Thor and Hulk are stated as MIA in Civil War so why would they be included? I think Cap's crew (Scarlet Witch, Hawkeye, Ant-man, Falcon) are "Secret Avengers" after the escape from the Raft and wouldn't be included. Tony's clearly got a public crew and I don't really think Dr. Strange or Black Panther are there yet.

Regarding the new shield for Cap Happy refers to-- Since Tony was showing working on a Captain America shield as early as the first Iron Man movie I don't know how much you can read into that.
Old 07-09-2017, 12:07 PM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: central Florida
Posts: 6,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skara_Brae View Post
If Cap and the others are still "war criminals," why did Happy make the comment about Cap's new shield being in the transport ship?
I think he said "prototype shield." He might be referring to the one that Stark had stored with his stuff in Iron Man 2.
Old 07-09-2017, 12:23 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Push You Down View Post
I'm talking who is REALLY on the team for Tony to have a press conference announcing a new member.

Thor and Hulk are stated as MIA in Civil War so why would they be included? I think Cap's crew (Scarlet Witch, Hawkeye, Ant-man, Falcon) are "Secret Avengers" after the escape from the Raft and wouldn't be included. Tony's clearly got a public crew and I don't really think Dr. Strange or Black Panther are there yet.
War Machine(I think he's recovered enough), the Vision, and Black Widow.

Speaking of that, I'm really glad they had Tony essentially acknowledging that bringing Parker into the fight was a bad thing in his discussion with him about that.

Particularly the line "If Cap had wanted to lay you out he'd have laid you out." and following it up by talking about how maybe he shouldn't have brought him in. Well, maybe Tony can be sure Cap wouldn't have hurt him and I'll agree the Cap of the movies wouldn't but that's still a huge gamble and that fight also had a high powered Scarlet Witch who had already demonstrated having a difficult time controlling her powers and Bucky Barnes who was at least as strong and powerful as Cap and had far, far less self-control and was the World's deadliest assassin.
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 AM.

Copyright © 2017
Best Topics: greenies drugs 1000 kilos floaters for dogs powerlisting wiki random 15 speed bike the hague pronunciation ritual of ch?d auto dealer names amtrak coach seating matthew glave imdb preserving beetles transformer blows up purple and violet define obviates encyclopedia britannica ebay basic instinct pussy beech nut tobacco native american noses comcast directv pig piles old microwave chiropractor reddit gang signs pictures active oxygen holy bible font allstate car rental foodhold usa website agility oblivion waist location define roommate pitbull taser american desires chase coin counting man tissues example of dry humor finding underground water lines will bleach kill mosquito larvae in standing water moon upside down in southern hemisphere gay college locker rooms orcs vs uruk hai te quiero mucho meaning pros and cons of dual citizenship usa mexico laminate vs bamboo vs hardwood cetirizine and loratadine together baking soda on burns tweety boy or girl what is the difference between no contract and unlocked cell phones damsel in distress train tracks magic eraser burns treatment cats scared of balloons which state has the longest name illinois children in front seat naked in front of parents taste bud that hurts can animals be retarded how to remove splinter under fingernail kramer's coffee table book 12 volt ac adapter radio shack dance song with accordion quarter of the hour why are bagpipes used at police funerals is oz a good show how do you pronounce dachshund long white hair on forehead can you have more than one cell phone with the same number ashton kutcher bacon number is it illegal to sit in your car in a parking lot