Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
#151
Old 07-17-2018, 11:17 AM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa &
Posts: 22,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novelty Bobble View Post
it just becomes tedious to me when it takes up the whole post.
Well, as long as the world is arranging itself to suit your needs, then...
Quote:
You'll note that my sarcasm was one, little throwaway, three-word sentence.
I do beg your pardon, I'm new at this. So you're saying a lighter hand is called for?
Quote:


Whatever "privilege" might be it doesn't manifest itself on a discussion board.
That is, completely unsarcastically-speaking, pure bullshit. Privilege manifests itself every single time a White person posts "Well, I don't see skin colour," for one thing.

Last edited by MrDibble; 07-17-2018 at 11:18 AM.
#152
Old 07-17-2018, 11:44 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
At the end of the day, there are very few transgender actors and even fewer roles as a transgender person. I can't think of a transgendered actor who's even on the B-list though I welcome correction. If movie studios hold out for a transgendered star for any movie that portrays a transgendered person, the movie will likely never get made. The same can't be said about black roles, black people being if anything slightly overrepresented in SAG, or even Latino roles, who are markedly underrepresented in SAG.
#153
Old 07-17-2018, 12:03 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa &
Posts: 22,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
I can't think of a transgendered actor who's even on the B-list though I welcome correction.
Laverne Cox?
#154
Old 07-17-2018, 12:32 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
Yeah, she's verging on A-list even. Definitely slipped my mind. Not suitable for his particular role, of course.
#155
Old 07-17-2018, 12:33 PM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South East England
Posts: 7,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrDibble View Post
Well, as long as the world is arranging itself to suit your needs, then
Nope, it was neither request nor an expectation. Merely an observation

Quote:
...I do beg your pardon, I'm new at this. So you're saying a lighter hand is called for?
No, read carefully.

Quote:
That is, completely unsarcastically-speaking, pure bullshit. Privilege manifests itself every single time a White person posts "Well, I don't see skin colour," for one thing.
We disagree clearly. I don't think ascribing a position based on skin colour is fair or helpful
#156
Old 07-17-2018, 12:38 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novelty Bobble View Post
We disagree clearly. I don't think ascribing a position based on skin colour is fair or helpful
In this case, it is probably both fair and helpful. If almost every person who says "I don't see skin color" is white, how is it either fair or helpful to ignore that fact?
#157
Old 07-17-2018, 12:39 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 51,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novelty Bobble View Post
Nope, it was neither request nor an expectation. Merely an observation

No, read carefully.

We disagree clearly. I don't think ascribing a position based on skin colour is fair or helpful
God, get a room you two.
#158
Old 07-17-2018, 03:31 PM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South East England
Posts: 7,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guinastasia View Post
God, get a room you two.
You are right (and have perfect comic timing......tricky on a text based medium)

An unnecessary diversion so I'll end my hijack there.
#159
Old 07-17-2018, 04:12 PM
Charter Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 10,199
Now it looks like the movie might not get made at all.
#160
Old 07-17-2018, 09:59 PM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Smurf Village.
Posts: 10,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
In this case, it is probably both fair and helpful. If almost every person who says "I don't see skin color" is white, how is it either fair or helpful to ignore that fact?
As a white, I've been told my whole life that I shouldn't see skin color.
__________________
"Small scrap nipple slap half half." -Max Black
#161
Old 07-17-2018, 10:59 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,774
I wonder how far this being offended if an exact doppelgnger isn’t playing a role is going to spread. Is it too late to unplug the internet?
#162
Old 07-17-2018, 11:06 PM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lima, Per
Posts: 4,363
Does this mean that The Rock shouldn't have played an amputee in Skyscraper?
#163
Old 07-17-2018, 11:31 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 51,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aj de Gallina View Post
Does this mean that The Rock shouldn't have played an amputee in Skyscraper?
Apparently so.
#164
Old 07-18-2018, 04:26 AM
Guest
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: "Hicksville", Ark.
Posts: 34,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novelty Bobble View Post
Nope, it was neither request nor an expectation. Merely an observation

No, read carefully.

We disagree clearly. I don't think ascribing a position based on skin colour is fair or helpful
And that disagreement is based on ignorance. The idea that you can be colorblind and remove your cultural influences has been shown to be false, and hasn't been seriously considered valid since the 1990s. Your opinion is one that is largely only held in 2018 by white people who have not experienced discrimination and stay in a bubble with others of the same kind. To claim that your privilege cannot affect you when you are speaking on a message board is profoundly ignorant, since privilege primarily manifests in your words and actions.

You have in fact been outdated at best with all of your arguments in this thread. You can even look at the OP to find that trans people do not accept that there are no "trans roles." That they do not accept cisgender women playing trans men. If a character is trans, they want them played by a trans person.

And, for goodness sake, you called monstro--an actual black woman--racist for trying to explain things. You're choosing to use the alt-right tactic of calling the person a racist because they are trying to educate you on racial issues. If a black person tells you about racism against black people, they tend to know what they are talking about.

So, when you claim you are describing the world as it is, why should anyone think that is the case? Why shouldn't we believe that it's just the world as viewed through your bubble, the bubble where you actively dismiss people with actual experience as racists?
#165
Old 07-18-2018, 06:54 AM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South East England
Posts: 7,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
And, for goodness sake, you called monstro--an actual black woman--racist for trying to explain things. You're choosing to use the alt-right tactic of calling the person a racist because they are trying to educate you on racial issues. If a black person tells you about racism against black people, they tend to know what they are talking about.
I don't buy your unsubstantiated claims and in the unlikely event that anyone wonders what I think on those points they can look back through the thread.
I said I wasn't going to hijack any further and i won't but nor will I let wilful misrepresentations be left unchallenged.

I did not call monstro a "racist" for trying to explain things.

This is what I very clearly did say to them

Quote:
monstro, that's your prejudice at work there. You need to accept that some people genuinely are not bothered about shades of colour, nor exact ethnicity and don't "see" them to any meaningful extent and it does not spring from, nor is it indicative of, a racist mindset.
And I ended my response thus..

Quote:
If you yourself are black and are sensitive to this, I understand that and perhaps if you are USA-based then your racial sensitively is calibrated very differently to mine. But just as I respect your experiences and behaviours, I think you also have a duty to take people at face value when they say they have a genuine and benign non-reaction and non-interest to skin shades and ethnicity.
Happy to put the record straight.
#166
Old 07-18-2018, 07:17 AM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,444
A 'genuine and benign non-reaction and non-interest to skin shades and ethnicity' would be all very well in a world where no-one was being treated differently due to skin shade or ethnicity. Unfortunately, that is not this world. In this world, people are regularly treated differently because of skin colour and ethnic origin, sometimes considerably so. Stating that you have no reaction and no interest doesn't mean that you're not causing the problem so it's all OK, it means you're not seeing that there is a problem.
#167
Old 07-18-2018, 11:11 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Borgia View Post
This situation is now a perfect example on why perfect is the enemy of good.
#168
Old 07-18-2018, 11:15 AM
Charter Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: In my own little world...
Posts: 12,390
I dunno, considering I’ve seen trans people argue that the original casting would’ve promoted the idea that trans men are just women playing dress up, I’m not so sure they mind. (IE I’m not so sure they saw the movie as necessarily a “good” to begin with.)

Last edited by Leaper; 07-18-2018 at 11:16 AM.
#169
Old 07-18-2018, 11:24 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaper View Post
I dunno, considering Ive seen trans people argue that the original casting wouldve promoted the idea that trans men are just women playing dress up, Im not so sure they mind. (IE Im not so sure they saw the movie as necessarily a good to begin with.)
Seeing as how the main character is a criminal who made a living off exploiting women, it was never going to be the most empowering trans centered movie regardless.
#170
Old 07-18-2018, 12:33 PM
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 7,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Borgia View Post

In the end the movie will be shaped into Tub and Rug, the story of the founder of a wholesale home furnishings empire.
#171
Old 07-18-2018, 01:14 PM
Sith Mod
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bear Flag Republic
Posts: 43,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Canuck View Post
This situation is now a perfect example on why perfect is the enemy of good.
That sort of assumes that the movie, as envisioned by Johansson, could legitimately be considered "good." My trans friends who had been following the story were apprehensive beyond just Johansson's casting (apparently, an earlier version of the script explicitly identified Dante as a lesbian, for one example) and Johansson's tone-deaf responses to the controversy didn't help.

Just reporting from the small corner of the trans community with which I'm personally familiar, the feeling seems more "bullet dodged" than "opportunity missed." A high-profile, pro-trans mainstream film would be great. A high-profile, mainstream film that perpetuates stereotypes and presents caricatured takes on trans lives would be worse than no film at all.
#172
Old 07-18-2018, 01:52 PM
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,125
A relevant 2017 article from the LA Times about authenticity in casting, mentioning Johannson's Ghost in the Shell controversy, among others. It focuses a little more on theatre than film, but it's a good overview of the issue.
#173
Old 07-18-2018, 02:21 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller View Post
Just reporting from the small corner of the trans community with which I'm personally familiar, the feeling seems more "bullet dodged" than "opportunity missed." A high-profile, pro-trans mainstream film would be great. A high-profile, mainstream film that perpetuates stereotypes and presents caricatured takes on trans lives would be worse than no film at all.
What? There was an assumed perpetuating of stereotypes and presentation of caricatures? I'd be curious to know how your trans community corner thought those were gonna be in the movie so early in development. Like I said above, despite the apparent colorfulness of the main character, this person was a f-to-m trans who ran a sex business. What stereotype is that perpetuating?

Last edited by CarnalK; 07-18-2018 at 02:23 PM.
#174
Old 07-18-2018, 03:29 PM
Sith Mod
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bear Flag Republic
Posts: 43,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
What? There was an assumed perpetuating of stereotypes and presentation of caricatures? I'd be curious to know how your trans community corner thought those were gonna be in the movie so early in development. Like I said above, despite the apparent colorfulness of the main character, this person was a f-to-m trans who ran a sex business. What stereotype is that perpetuating?
I'd say there was more of a "concern" than an "assumption." There were some red flags raised for friends of mine, including but not limited to Johansson being in the lead role. The concern was that these flags indicated an overall failure on the part of the production company to understand the issues they were trying to turn into a movie. So far as I'm aware, there was no specific objection to making a movie about this particular individual, unsavory aspects and all - the concern about stereotypes was less about the particulars of Dante Gill's life, and more about the way they would present Gill's gender identity and expression. A common concern I've heard, for example, was that Johansson would be playing Dante as a butch (and soft butch at that, given the actor involved) lesbian, with an eye towards serving up some girl-girl action for straight, cis audiences. These concerns may have been unfounded, but Johansson did very little to reassure the community that she actually cared about anyone in it (see her dismissive tweet immediately after the controversy broke) and Hollywoods done a generally shitty job (with some exceptions) at portraying trans people in a respectful, non-exploitative manner. So, there wasnt a lot of high hopes in my social circle for this going in, and I dont imagine a lot of concern that the project has crashed and burned now. As regards Canucks perfect being the enemy of the good, post, there was very little expectation that this would rise to the level of good in the first place.
#175
Old 07-18-2018, 03:56 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
Well, I don't know how happy your friends will be about it, but I bet we won't see anyone attempt another trans centered movie for a long time now.
#176
Old 07-18-2018, 03:59 PM
Sith Mod
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bear Flag Republic
Posts: 43,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
Well, I don't know how happy your friends will be about it, but I bet we won't see anyone attempt another trans centered movie for a long time now.
How much?
#177
Old 07-18-2018, 04:00 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
20 internet dollars.
#178
Old 07-18-2018, 04:05 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
I mean if you include all indy shit, sure something will be made. But it's pretty obvious to me that no big picture is going to be made. There's no real trans star on the horizon to pull this into mainstream.
#179
Old 07-18-2018, 04:26 PM
Charter Member
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 77,479
That sounds circular, to me. You can't have a trans movie without a trans star, and you can't have a trans star without a trans movie, therefore neither will ever exist.
#180
Old 07-18-2018, 04:37 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
That sounds circular, to me. You can't have a trans movie without a trans star, and you can't have a trans star without a trans movie, therefore neither will ever exist.
It is circular. It's also true. And the fact that transgendered people make up such a small percentage of the population means it's probably going to continue to be true.
#181
Old 07-18-2018, 06:19 PM
Guest
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: "Hicksville", Ark.
Posts: 34,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
Well, I don't know how happy your friends will be about it, but I bet we won't see anyone attempt another trans centered movie for a long time now.
First off, that's stupid. There will continue to be independent movies by trans people.

But, yes, it may discourage Hollywood from making more movies like this. What you fail to grasp is that is a good, if not perfect, outcome. In the current system, they would only be made so that some actor could get some sort of praise for playing a "difficult role," while exploiting the story of a trans person.

I mean, look at the subject of this movie. I'm sure the guy has a story to tell, but look at how neatly it fits into the stereotype that trans people are sexual deviants. It's not about the struggles of some trans athlete or model who is perfectly wholesome. It's about the guy who started all those "happy ending" massage parlors. The title makes it clear that's the reason to watch--to see the seedy, sexy underbelly.

Sure, maybe a version where trans people are in charge and make sure that it's not exploitative or perpetuating stereotypes would have been ideal. But I fully understand why shutting it down entirely is acceptable. Better to not have any mainstream movies than to have Hollywood put out this trash.

Like Moana, there will eventually be a movie where they do listen and try to make things work. Until then, it's fine if trans stories are only in independent films. Better to tell their stories accurately than try to reach a mass audience.

The person who actually taps into this and pulls it off is going to be quite well-off, since basically the entire social justice crowd will want to go see it.
#182
Old 07-18-2018, 06:20 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller View Post
Just reporting from the small corner of the trans community with which I'm personally familiar, the feeling seems more "bullet dodged" than "opportunity missed." A high-profile, pro-trans mainstream film would be great. A high-profile, mainstream film that perpetuates stereotypes and presents caricatured takes on trans lives would be worse than no film at all.
Fair enough. I personally believe that more exposure to the concept that transexuals are just people would be good for society in a general sort of way. Due to human xenophobia, people fear what they don't understand, and the easiest way to help them understand is teach them in a way that they might listen. So even though it probably would still be full of caricatured takes and stereotypes (because it's still a Hollywood movie) I still think it would probably be better for both the trans community and society as a whole if it was made.

Then again, I'm a cis guy who has never even heard of the subject of this movie, so take my opinion with a large grain of salt. That said, I agree with CarnalK, this situation will cause a chilling effect on future movies focused on trans people.
#183
Old 07-18-2018, 06:35 PM
Charter Member
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 77,479
Quote:
Quoth CarnalK:

It is circular. It's also true.
But the same argument could also be used to "prove" that there will never be a star born after the year 2000. Which is clearly absurd. The flaw, of course, is that not every movie has a star in the lead, and not every star has been the lead in a movie.

Eventually, a studio will make a movie with a star in the lead, and a transgendered actor in one of the supporting roles, and that actor's career will grow from there. Or they'll make a movie about a transgendered character, and find a previously-unknown trans actor to star in it. Or maybe it'll be a movie for which the main character's gender identity and/or physical sex doesn't even matter, and it just happens to be a trans actor who passes the audition.
#184
Old 07-18-2018, 06:54 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 15,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
But the same argument could also be used to "prove" that there will never be a star born after the year 2000. Which is clearly absurd. The flaw, of course, is that not every movie has a star in the lead, and not every star has been the lead in a movie.

Eventually, a studio will make a movie with a star in the lead, and a transgendered actor in one of the supporting roles, and that actor's career will grow from there. Or they'll make a movie about a transgendered character, and find a previously-unknown trans actor to star in it. Or maybe it'll be a movie for which the main character's gender identity and/or physical sex doesn't even matter, and it just happens to be a trans actor who passes the audition.
No, that probably won't happen and if it does it it won't be the beginning of a trend. There's just too few transgender actors to build any real momentum with it.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 PM.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: [email protected]

Send comments about this website to:

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright 2018 STM Reader, LLC.

Copyright © 2017
Best Topics: mechiah yiddish shooting range costs minnesota twins symbols russian porn industry infant toga excession definition extract bottles crt resolution uber vampire mattie rich apes in south america how much are concert t shirts lovers or losers game show where are fireflies in the us can chainmail stop bullets strong like ox movie quote innovative performance chips review james spader look alike figure of 8 splint what does amy say in chinese t6 texan 2 for sale pod cost vs uhaul