#1
Old 07-03-2000, 06:51 PM
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Pacific Grove, Calif
Posts: 17,493
Doesn't really look like her does it? Where would she can an all around perfect tan?

Pssssssst! There are pictures of her on the net if you're too cheap to buy the Playboy :
http://liquid2k.com/greatowl/conger/

At least until someone takes it down.
#2
Old 07-03-2000, 07:10 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,705
Come on, handy, this is a family show here!

But yeah, it really doesn't look like her compared to the photo where she is standing next to Rockwell. I did hear that there was more air brushing involved than usual, but I didn't think it would change her that much.
#3
Old 07-03-2000, 07:36 PM
Charter Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 24,030
YUUKKKK!

Talk about UGLEEEEE!

Who in their right mind actually wants to look so artificial? I just don't get it.
#4
Old 07-03-2000, 07:45 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,705
Well, at least she is saleen (sp?) and silicon free.
#5
Old 07-03-2000, 07:48 PM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Grits Country
Posts: 3,842
She's IQ-free too.
#6
Old 07-03-2000, 08:01 PM
Charter Member
Charter Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: far away from the SDMB
Posts: 6,610
Sorry, lapsing into my judgmental, prune-faced pissant mode, but what a skank.

Didn't see the show (not my tipple), but you'd have to have lived on Neptune not to catch the fallout. I was willing to give Darva the benefit of the doubt, she did a stupid thing, etc. etc. but wasn't totally warped.

Oh, c'mon. She can't get a nursing job?! Give me a freakin' break. Qualified nurses are pure gold. If she hadn't kept the whole fiasco alive, wouldn't be a reporter or photographer interested.

-->the following is a careful disclaimer; comments not intended to include nudists and happily unihibited people<--

If someone is body-proud and unashamed, that's fine, honestly fine and admirable. But coyly playing "victim of the media", broke and can't get a nursing job, etc.--oh, puhleeze.

Strictly as a sidenote, is posting that kind of proprietary stuff okay for SD? I have no idea, just wondering.

Veb
#7
Old 07-03-2000, 08:02 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,010
Why, oh why, can't she just be a good girl and go AWAY? Seeing her on TV once was bad enough. Seeing her on "Politically Incorrect" was not fun. Listening to Jim Rome talk about her for a ****** hour was a waste of breath.

I'm not even going to TOUCH the idea of her being nude. You could not pay me.
#8
Old 07-03-2000, 10:14 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 389
Ummm, apperently it was cold, REAL cold. That actually looks really painfully cold (you know what I mean ladies).

I don't think she is a skank, but I do think she is pretty pathetic and I feel sorry for her. She could do well for herself if she tried, but well, she is pretty pathetic.
#9
Old 07-03-2000, 10:47 PM
Charter Member
Charter Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: far away from the SDMB
Posts: 6,610
Two words: Tanya Harding.

People we knew waaYYY more than we ever wanted to know, and were so grateful when they faded from view.

Veb
#10
Old 07-03-2000, 10:59 PM
Straight Dope Science Advisory Board
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: With Candy Darling
Posts: 15,989
I think she's very nice, but a way too thin.
#11
Old 07-03-2000, 11:15 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 2,051
Her nipples are horrifying! I have never in my life seen nipples like that...NEVER! Granted I have not seen many, but still...yuck yuck yuck yuck yuck!

Moving along...people sure do stupid shit for money. She is skinny and not that pretty, but for godsakes, get an office job or something. There is no need for her to degrade herself like that!

Yuck! Yuck!
#12
Old 07-03-2000, 11:48 PM
Charter Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 17,000
Well, yes I'm pretty sure it is her. It does seem clear that she's had some secret plastic surgery which shockingly has been kept quiet. I've seen alot of the press conferences recently over this, and it seems certain to me that its the same person head to toe. BTW, airbrushing is great for blemishes, it doesn't change ones shape and still present realistically in print. A comparison to the "wedding" photo does look suspiscious, this is evidence of some plastic surgery to me, not a conspiracy by Playboy. Playboy has too much to lose by lying anyways.

On to the the obligatory rants and raves. 1) She got on TV for her 15 minutes of fame. 2) She most likely didn't expect or want to get married. 3) She is milking the fame for all its worth. 4) She's playing the victim of the media role to try and deflect the golddigger label. 5) Its not fair to call her a golddigger for marrying the "millionaire". 6) It is fair to call her a liar and fame hound. 7) If you morally disgusted, yet completely fixated people would let it go she'd disaapear, the fact everyone enjoys vilifying her so much gives Rome a reason to badger her in primetime.

FTR, she's pretty fucking hot by typical nurse standards. Yeah, in the wedding on TV she looks pretty bad compared to typical TV people, but IRL most everyone would at least argee shes not ugly. She might not be your type, but she's not ugly or disgusting. In Playboy (post surgery?) she is flat out hot, the unaugmented body a pleasent change. Now, if you are biased against stereotypical California blonde types fine, but ranting on how "gross" she looks make you sound pretty childish, or maybe jealous. Anyways, if you want her to go away, and you want to look down your nose at her, try and get over it so the media has nothing to report.

Nacho, maybe its personal taste, but I like her nipples. One of those things I like to notice on a woman, probably since, unlike men, some women show no visual signs of arousal. Nips are the exception, and Darva's rival the male's response .
#13
Old 07-03-2000, 11:59 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 643
OK, I looked.

I would give anything to have that body, EXCEPT for those nipples. ick.

I wouldn't have recognized her if I didn't already know who I was looking at. I think it is her nose that makes her look so different now.
__________________
You know you have been a vet nurse too long when: normal people will no longer eat with you.
#14
Old 07-04-2000, 12:22 AM
Guest
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Back in California.
Posts: 9,237
I never thought she was ugly. I agree, to go on about how "gross" she is is unkind. I'd die happy to have a figure like that. (OK, I'd probably gain a few pounds, but what the hell.) Compared to your average shmoe out there, she's pretty. Fair is fair, she's attractive - maybe not everyone's type, but basically attractive. Even with her apparently (to some of you) unattractive nose, she's still not ugly. Once again, compare her to your average shmoe. Or just look in the mirror. I don't like insults bandied around about anyone's looks - I'm funny like that.

As far as doing Playboy, yeah, tacky. And it's not like I look at Playboy, but I've gotten the impression that some of the girls' poses in there can be a little more "suggestive" or "lurid". Darva's poses are more "tasteful" or even "arty". But, still, in my opinion, I think her posing in Playboy was tacky.

I have no opinion about her nipples. Nipples is nipples, you get what you get. (I guess I have a more liberal attitude about naked people, male or female. I have taken tons of Life Drawing classes, and have drawn every imaginable variation of the naked human body, from live nude models.) And come to think of it, Darva's poses were more "Life Drawing" type poses. So - *shrug*.
#15
Old 07-04-2000, 12:33 AM
Guest
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Sunny Florida, but someti
Posts: 4,583
OK. I looked, too.

Not exactly my type overall, but I would hardly call her ugly or a skank. As a person, she disgusts me. As a pure physical form, I did not have to force myself to look closely.

Of course, I happen to like large, erect nipples. They are fun to play with.
#16
Old 07-04-2000, 01:01 AM
Guest
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 881
My only comment

OK bod (a bit on teh malnourished side, but not bad) but dear lord did you SEE THE MAKE-UP? These pictures make Tammy Fae look "natural" My god, did they apply it with a paint roller or what? I mean, dear god, PETA should protest on account of the distinct possibility that passing wildlife (flies, mosquitoes, small birds) could get stuck to her face. Jeez, honey, wash some of that crap off...

Jayron32 (whose own taste runs more towards well-fed, un-made-up women)
__________________
Jason R Remy

Your hands and feet are mangoes
You're gonna be a genius anyways

-- Phish "The Mango Song"
#17
Old 07-04-2000, 03:00 AM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 16,007
No comment on the nipples; since I'm a female, the point is moot. But the two supine shots look creepy; her body is too long and thin, like kelp that washed up on shore.

Veb, I think you meant to say "prurient". I suppose it is, but this is the Web, not AOL, and we're under no obligation to keep this a "family show", as vandal claims. Ultimately, it's up to the mods and the Reader.
#18
Old 07-04-2000, 03:05 AM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: The Jersey Shore (USA)
Posts: 5,476
I'd do her.

I may have been to sea for four and a half months, but I know a beautiful female when I see one.
#19
Old 07-04-2000, 03:07 AM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: The Jersey Shore (USA)
Posts: 5,476
But she is interchangeable with every Playboy playmate of the year for the last decade.
#20
Old 07-04-2000, 03:21 AM
Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 27,130
Oh C'mon you hypocrites... So the pictures are 'tacky'. She was paid something like half a million dollars for those pictures. C'mon, look uncle Dan straight in the monitor and tell me that if someone knocked on your door and said, "spend a day with us, letting us take tasteful pictures of you nude, and we'll give you more money than you can possibly hope to earn busting your ass in a clerical job for the next twenty years," you'd just say "I'm not tacky" and slam the door?

This isn't exactly Hustler she's posing for. Posing for Playboy is no big deal. Many famous people have done it. Gloria Steinem was a Playboy Bunny.

If you ask me, she's been very smart through this whole thing. I saw her on Politically Incorrect, and she seemed pretty sharp. She also admitted that she was stupid for having done it in the first place. Very shrewd. The stupid mistake got her in the public eye. Once there, she's managed to stay in it, by admitting right from the bat that she was wrong for doing it. Now the Playboy spread not only make her a lifetime's worth of income, but it keeps her in the public eye for another month, long enough for her publicist or agent (I'll bet she has one) to find her some other gigs.

The whole premise of the show was, "Marry this Dork, and get half of his million." Well, she found a way to get the half million AND put the boots to the dork without so much as having to undress in front of him.
#21
Old 07-04-2000, 03:30 AM
DRY DRY is offline
Guest
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,133
She's pretty enough...

Quote:
Originally posted by ChiefScott
But she is interchangeable with every Playboy playmate of the year for the last decade.
but interchangeable with every Playboy playmate of the month? I think not--too thin for one thing.

Sure, she's an attractive woman, but this was the same woman who wanted her privacy and her life back. One wonders what she'll do for an encore.
__________________
Thank you to everyone who made my stay here an enjoyable one.

To any at all whom I have offended or alienated, I apologize. I desire the enmity of no one.
#22
Old 07-04-2000, 03:50 PM
Charter Member
Charter Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: far away from the SDMB
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally posted by Rilchiam


Veb, I think you meant to say "prurient". I suppose it is, but this is the Web, not AOL, and we're under no obligation to keep this a "family show", as vandal claims. Ultimately, it's up to the mods and the Reader.
Thanks for catching me up on my distinctly foggy thought, there. Actually, I didn't mean "prurient", mainly because anyplace that gleefully discusses felching can't be accused of stodginess! ->assume winking smiley here<-

The point I was bumbling around was there was some flapdoodle and discussion, quite a while back, about what was kosher and okay to crosspost, more from a copyright aspect or something.

As you can see, my brain has turned to farina, so it's probably a total non-issue anyway.

Just as a clarification, I think Darva is very attractive. (Don't like her makeup, but that's a quibble.) My sole criticism is that her posing for Playboy runs directly counter to what she'd stated earlier about herself. I don't care if people pose naked; nothing shameful about it. But if she's gonna do this, she needs to get honest about it.

Veb
#23
Old 07-04-2000, 03:55 PM
Guest
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 2,533
The pictures aren't bad, but you can do miracles with a good stylist. However, my respect for her dropped to a new low when she announced that she wants to take over from Kathie Lee. That combined with the pictures really makes her look like a hypocrite. Go away Darva. Now. Please.

Keith
__________________
One of 19 posters personally welcomed to the SDMB by Cecil Adams.
#24
Old 07-04-2000, 05:20 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FL
Posts: 7,474
eeeeeeeeeeek

She's way too androgynous, and the nipples are kinda yucky. I just think she isn't the image of beauty in my mind. It's so not what i think is pretty, and i am more towards a rounder figure, more of a botticelli image of women. My image of female beauty would be best depicted in cabanel's "birth of venus."
#25
Old 07-04-2000, 09:26 PM
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Pacific Grove, Calif
Posts: 17,493
Yes, her nipples are weird. I needed to zoom down to them just to make sure my eyes saw what they thing. Shoot, you could hang a coat hanger from them.
#26
Old 07-04-2000, 10:13 PM
Guest
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 2,957
I saw the picture and I liked them. They took the pictures in Utah and I think they're not in poor taste. I think Darva's an attractive woman and she's getting as much as she can out of the whole millionaire mess.

I don't agree with what she's doing. I definitely think people wouldn't care so much if she were truthful about the whole deal instead of trying to portray herself as some sort of victim.

Still...I wouldn't mind having that body. She's in great shape (obvious from the pictures and from the show). She does have on a lot of makeup but so what, big deal.
#27
Old 07-04-2000, 10:44 PM
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 2,051
Quote:
Nacho, maybe its personal taste, but I like her nipples. One of those things I like to notice on a woman, probably since, unlike men, some women show no visual signs of arousal. Nips are the exception, and Darva's rival the male's response
There are nipples, there are hard nipples, and then there are Darva's nipples. Again, I have not seen many but I have seen none that look like that. If this makes me immature, fine. Hell, maybe I am jealous because my nipples can't poke people in the eye from across the room. You make the call, buddy. Whatever.

Anyway, maybe I'm a prude but she is being hypocritical, and I only saw her in PIC for about 5 minutes, and sharp is not the way I'd describe her. Yes, she has a nice body, but she is rather skinny. That's not jealousy, just honesty. I much prefer my figure to hers, is all.

Well, it's her life, she can do what she wants. Maybe she'll release an album next and show up on that VH1 show about one-hit wonders and has-beens.
#28
Old 07-04-2000, 10:53 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,010
For someone who says she's tired of being in the public eye . . . um, nice try. You do not, if you're trying to do that, go to an Oscar party, show up on Politically Incorrect, and pose nude for anyone.

I personally think she looks disgusting, esp. that shot of her with her ribs sticking out.

And for those of you who said you looked better or would like to look better, lessee! Not necessarily nude, as Bratman, I think, still gets the nude shots of newbies, along with Shayna.
#29
Old 07-04-2000, 11:17 PM
Charter Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 17,000
Think about this. Maybe she is unhappy with the attention, and I honestly don't think she expected to get as much as she did. The point of the matter is that its not a simple black and white issue. She might very well hate the media attention and not want to be judged and flamed by people who don't know her at all. She didn't handle herself well at first either, though lately she's been coming clean and being more honest and believable. The point I'm getting to is this, no matter how badly she hates the attention she has to weigh the pros and cons of the situation. The cons are, as long as she is in the spotlight she'll be hated by many and respected by few. She'll have very little privacy and will be hounded by paparazzi. The pros are she'll get to do tons of things that most of America (especially women) dream about doing, and she's getting a fuckload of money. For most of us, when opportunity comes knocking we grab it by the balls and manage the concequences. The fact she's doing all kinds of things to stay in the spotlight, and objectifying herself in many peoples eyes doesn't mean she is lying about wanting to not be in the spotlight. She just decided that the benefits make it worth it, and I think a half a million dollars and the potential hopes of a new career in Hollywood would make alot of the dissenters do the same.

Michael Jordan constantly says he hates the media attention and wishes he were just like everyone else. However no one honestly wonders why he kept playing basketball and doing commercials. The life isn't perfect, and the attention is a necessary evil but most of us would do anything to be in his shoes. Same goes for Darva, yeah she hates the attention and she's not exactly proud of how she got it, but she'd be foolish to not take advantage of the opportunities. Think about it before you get all catty.
#30
Old 07-05-2000, 04:51 AM
DRY DRY is offline
Guest
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
Originally posted by iampunha

And for those of you who said you looked better or would like to look better, lessee! Not necessarily nude, as Bratman, I think, still gets the nude shots of newbies, along with Shayna.
Iampunha, my man, no one has the heart to tell you this, but we all let Bratman get the nude shots of the newbies because he makes copies and circulates them to all us SDMB veterans.

But you have to earn your way in, put up with the hazing (which may or may not include felching), have some SDMB vet sponsor you, and learn the secret handshake. You don't simply get in by accumulating "X" number of posts.

Don't let anyone find out I told you, as divulging this could very well lead to my expulsion from the society.

I must say it's worthwhile, though. Some of these newbie nudies make Darva Conger look like a GUY!
__________________
Thank you to everyone who made my stay here an enjoyable one.

To any at all whom I have offended or alienated, I apologize. I desire the enmity of no one.
#31
Old 07-05-2000, 06:16 AM
Guest
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,599
I would love to have a bod like that...

but I gotta go with earlier statements about the nipples. Naw, there ain't a whole lot to be done about 'em, but crikey...they're like...buttons. (Kinda gives a whole new feel to the "righty tighty, lefty loosey" thing, dunnit?)

FWIW, I'm not terribly pleased with mine, either. If I could keep my boobs and take her body, I'd be one woman who's exceptionally (probably excessively) pleased with her body.

And Omni, I'm right with ya as far as why she did this and why it's alright.
#32
Old 07-05-2000, 11:54 AM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,489
Say what you will about Darva but...

... in a world that measures success in fame and fortune she was smart enough to see an opportunity, grab it and make the most of it.

Clearly she hasn't the IQ to split atoms or map the DNA chain molecules, but that would be a detriment rather than an asset in the field she's chosen to pusue - and that, folks, would be ShowBiz. We don't ask alot of our showbiz folk. Good looks, an ability to speak and act well. From what interviews I've seen of her, she's got all those skills down pat. All she needs now is more opportunities and she is not sitting around at home waiting for them to knock on her door. She is doing the best she can with the assets she has - nipples and all - to stay in the public and network eye.

What jumps out at me immediately about this rather silly thread is that the very same people who insist that every person is a unique individual who should be respected for his/her uniqueness, are the same people who condemn DC for being too skinny and having. Immature and jealous, indeed!

Get a grip folks. DC is not running for congress and she does not want to be your next president. At most she wants to co-host an unimportant day time show with a guy named Philbin. Will that really rock the foundations of Western civilization if she succeeds? I'm personally all for it if it gets Kathy Lee Gifford off the network and onto some cable evangelist channel which I have already blocked out on my cable box.
#33
Old 07-05-2000, 12:03 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,489
Arghhh....why can't we edit our posts?!

That should have been of course....

"....too skinny and having rather prominently erect nipples."


D'oh!
#34
Old 07-05-2000, 02:07 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Oakland, CA, USA
Posts: 5,625
I'll just ignore the question of the hypocrisy/skankiness of Darva posing for Playboy.

The important issue here is the nipples, dammit.

I have seen nipples like hers and let's just say I enjoy them mightily. They are on the large side but not unreasonably so.

From my point of view there are only two important attributes in a woman's nipples:

1) How sensitive are they (I was once involved with a woman whose breasts did not seem to have nerve endings)?

2) That they not be hairy.
#35
Old 07-05-2000, 06:11 PM
Guest
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 776
More power to her... she got more of her 15 minutes than most ever get, and is walking away from it with quite a bit of cash.

Best bit of humor to come out of this debacle was on the daily show, where it was revealed that Darva Conger and Monica Lewinski were going to have a spectacular all nude hot oil wrestling privacy-a-thon.

Or something like that.
__________________
http://madpoet.com
The wine has no taste. The food sickens you. There seems no reason for any of it, does there? But what if I could give it back to you? Pluck out the pain and give you another life? And it would be for all time? And sickeness and death could never touch you again?
#36
Old 07-06-2000, 07:41 AM
Guest
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 17,117
You'll put your eye out, kid!
#37
Old 07-06-2000, 11:40 AM
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Pacific Grove, Calif
Posts: 17,493
She was on tv yesterday, said she would get around $1M for the pictures eventually.

don't like her IQ? I wonder why because she works in hospitals ER rooms & you would have to be pretty bright to work in those.
#38
Old 07-06-2000, 11:42 AM
Guest
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,226
Nipples, schmipples.

Will you look at that mohawk?!?

I'd hate to the be the person who waxed (and bleached) that one.
#39
Old 07-06-2000, 11:48 AM
Guest
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 2,533
I read an interview where she said that she has become a religious person and she felt that God wouldn't be upset with her posing for Playboy because she kept her legs together when she posed. She felt that God would want her to display her body as long as she didn't show what was "down there".
Keith
#40
Old 07-06-2000, 11:55 AM
Charter Member
Charter Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Irvine, California, USA
Posts: 14,822
Good one Odieman! (I assume you're kidding.)
#41
Old 07-06-2000, 12:38 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 499
Yes they are fun to play with, but the girlfriend says that as they get bigger, they get much more sensitive and less fun for the owner, almost to the point of pain. I've learned to stay the heck away when they're aroused (or at least be extremely gentle) else I'll get swiftly rebuked.

After seeing the photos, I'm judging that Darva must be super duper extra sensitive.
#42
Old 07-06-2000, 01:28 PM
Guest
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 2,533
Unfortunately it's true: A quote from the Washington Post TV column :"Darva's "Today" show appearance kicked off a media blitz orchestrated by Playboy. During her last talk-show swing, not long after Rick Rockwell picked her from among 50 women to be his bride on the Fox sweeps hit, Darva told "Today's" Matt Lauer and "Good Morning America's" Diane Sawyer that the marriage wasn't binding because she's a good Christian, and God wasn't buying it. Yesterday, she told Lauer she's confident God will forgive her for her Playboy spread because "He's . . . much more accepting and forgiving than the rest of the public."


And besides, she told Lauer, the Playboy issue is "a good product." And we all know how much God appreciates good product.


On the cover, Conger is fully clothed in a wedding gown--a homage to the Fox special that made her famous. Inside, she's seen in a desert setting minus clothes but sporting hair extensions. And, as Darva noted to Larry King last night on his CNN show, it's all very tasteful because her knees are firmly together in every shot."
Keith
#43
Old 07-06-2000, 01:38 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Redmond, WA USA
Posts: 3,407
Quote:
Originally posted by Grace
I saw the picture and I liked them. They took the pictures in Utah and I think they're not in poor taste. I think Darva's an attractive woman and she's getting as much as she can out of the whole millionaire mess.

I don't agree with what she's doing. I definitely think people wouldn't care so much if she were truthful about the whole deal instead of trying to portray herself as some sort of victim.

Still...I wouldn't mind having that body. She's in great shape (obvious from the pictures and from the show). She does have on a lot of makeup but so what, big deal.
Actually they were taken on the Arizona side of Lake Powell. Like Utah would ever let them do nude photography at one of their "Family" resorts...
__________________
_______________
"You need to have performed three miracles to become a saint, and two of them can be card tricks." - Snooooopy
#44
Old 07-06-2000, 02:01 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Oakland, CA, USA
Posts: 5,625
Quote:
Originally posted by ignatiusjreilly
Yes they are fun to play with, but the girlfriend says that as they get bigger, they get much more sensitive and less fun for the owner, almost to the point of pain. I've learned to stay the heck away when they're aroused (or at least be extremely gentle) else I'll get swiftly rebuked.

After seeing the photos, I'm judging that Darva must be super duper extra sensitive.
I've noticed a slight correlection between size and sensitivity (nowhere near 1:1 but significant) but have never run into too sensitive. With the really sensitive ones it seems I eventually have to beg to play with some other part for a while.

Someone should send Darva a letter and ask.
#45
Old 07-06-2000, 02:14 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 499
I guess I should be clearer and change my message to read "level of arousal" instead of "size". Girlfriend says they get more and more sensitive as arousal (and perkiness) increases, but I have no idea as to whether bigger nipples imply more sensitivity when aroused. My girlfriend is rather small breasted with nipples that aren't too big or too small, they're just right .

I can't tell if Darva is seriously aroused in the pictures or just possessing of really big nipples... But if she is just aroused, then I would guess she was really sensitive, too. I could hang my jockstrap on those things... yikes
#46
Old 07-06-2000, 02:31 PM
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,313
More power to her and her nipples.
#47
Old 07-06-2000, 02:41 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 499
Reminds me...

Anyone remember Patti (sp?) Davis' (Reagan) spread in Playboy about 5 years ago? She had really big and long nips too. I remember Howard Stern went off talking about those things for days. I would assume he has some choice comments about Darva, too, but unfortunately I don't get to listen to him here in Houston. Anyway, Patti's were pretty unusual looking, too.
#48
Old 07-06-2000, 04:21 PM
Charter Member
Charter Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Irvine, California, USA
Posts: 14,822
I don't understand (thank you for the quotes Odieman) why Darva Conger thinks God would have to forgive her for appearing in playboy? God, like any other guy, probably buys playboy every month at the newsstand. But since he only buys it for the articles, he probably won't even notice she's in it.
#49
Old 07-06-2000, 06:51 PM
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Redwood City, California
Posts: 24
Darva and her incredible nipples

Having seen many nipples in my tenure here on the blue marble, these are not really that noteworthy. On the other hand, niether is Darva. Unusual but not really important. But then again this is the MPSIMS portion of the board so I guess it fits.

I've never had a very big reaction to Darva. Now that I've seen her boobies, no difference. She is alas, forgettable. Get it while you can Darva!

Does anybody know anybody else with the name Darva? Now that's an unusual name.
#50
Old 07-06-2000, 07:22 PM
Guest
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston, Florida
Posts: 701
I'd plug her and leave her drippin'.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: [email protected]

Send comments about this website to:

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright 2018 STM Reader, LLC.

Copyright © 2017
Best Topics: cheryl ellis jtv tip aaa guy gimcrack corn kike origin sex with ape battle cats snl heifer charities bx abbreviation brita filter micron freecell winning percentage move on back to squares wusthof knives bed bath and beyond bug bite oozing clear fluid growth spurt at 22 years old in a similar vein can you go back to high school after graduating chinese restaurant tea type i don't do windows super glued fingers together what is a burro show difference between yellow and white popcorn kernels italian words for delicious